Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Effects of combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to peripheral nerve blocks: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
  1. Mathias Maagaard1,
  2. Jakob Hessel Andersen1,
  3. Pia Jaeger2 and
  4. Ole Mathiesen1,3
  1. 1Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Koge, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Anaesthesia, the Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark
  3. 3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Mathias Maagaard, Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital Koge, Koge, Sjælland, Denmark; mathias.maagaard{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background/importance The effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration are unclear.

Objective To investigate the effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration.

Evidence review Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, the Web of Science, and BIOSIS until June 8, 2023. RCTs with adults undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block randomized to combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine versus placebo or other adjuncts were eligible. Primary outcome was duration of analgesia. We performed meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, risk of bias-2, and Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment.

Findings We included 9 RCTs with 14 eligible comparisons. The combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine was compared with placebo in three RCTs (173 participants), dexamethasone in seven (569 participants), and dexmedetomidine in four (281 participants). The duration of analgesia was likely increased with the combination versus placebo (mean difference 460 min, 95% CI 249 to 671) and versus dexmedetomidine (mean difference 388 min, 95% CI 211 to 565). The duration was likely similar with the combination versus dexamethasone (mean difference 50 min, 95% CI −140 to 239). The certainty of the evidence was moderate because most trials were at high risk of bias.

Conclusions Combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine likely increased the duration of analgesia when compared with placebo and dexmedetomidine. The combination likely provided a similar duration of analgesia as dexamethasone. Based on this systematic review, it seems reasonable to use dexamethasone as the sole adjunct if the goal is to increase the duration of analgesia.

  • analgesia
  • Brachial Plexus
  • Anesthesia, Local
  • Nerve Block
  • Pain, Postoperative

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors MM, JHA, PJ and OM wrote the protocol, screened the literature, extracted data, and performed risk of bias assessments. MM performed statistical analyses and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.

  • Funding This study was supported by Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.

  • Competing interests The authors have also been the initiators of the ADJUNCT2 trial assessing the effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to a popliteal and saphenous nerve block in patients undergoing surgery of the foot and ankle.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.