Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Femoral triangle block plus iPACK block versus local infiltration analgesia for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an infographic
Free
  1. Eric S Schwenk1 and
  2. Rajnish K Gupta2
  1. 1 Anesthesiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2 Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Eric S Schwenk, Anesthesiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; prepdrum{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be painful, and both the femoral triangle block and local infiltration analgesia have been shown to provide effective analgesia after this surgery. A relatively new block, the iPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee), has been reported to provide posterior knee analgesia. In this triple-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 60 patients, the combination of femoral triangle block and iPACK block reduced opioid consumption for 24 hours postoperatively compared with local infiltration analgesia.1 However, other pain and functional outcomes were the same in both groups.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Jim Snively, artist, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for creation of this infographic.

Reference

Footnotes

  • Twitter @ESchwenkMD, @dr_rajgupta

  • Collaborators Jim Snively.

  • Contributors Both authors edited the infographic and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles