Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Repeated Failure of Epidural Analgesia: An Association With Epidural Fat?
  1. Scott A. Lang, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.,
  2. Peter Korzeniewski, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.,
  3. Donald Buie, M.D., F.R.C.S.C.,
  4. Stephan du Plessis, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med.,
  5. Kimiko Paterson, M.D. and
  6. Gary Morris, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.
  1. From the Departments of Anesthesia (S.A.L., P.K.), Surgery (D.B., S.d.P.), and Radiology (K.P.), Foothills Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and the Department of Anesthesia (G.M.), Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
  1. Reprint requests: Scott A. Lang, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Department of Anesthesia, Foothills Hospital, 1403-19th St NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 2T9. E-mail: scottalang{at}shaw.ca.

Abstract

Background and Objective To report the case of a patient who experienced repeated failed epidural analgesia associated with an unusual amount of fat in the epidural space (epidural lipomatosis).

Case Report A 44-year-old female presented for an elective small bowel resection. An L1-2 epidural catheter was placed for postoperative analgesia. The patient gave no indication of having pain at the time of emergence from general anesthesia or in the first 2 hours in the recovery room. Assessment of the level of hypoesthesia to ice while the patient was comfortable in the recovery room suggested a functional epidural catheter (cephalad level of T10). Two hours after admission to the recovery room the patient began to complain of increasing pain. Another 6 mL 0.25% bupivacaine was administered via the catheter. The patient’s pain decreased, but remained substantial, and there was minimal evidence of sensory block above the T10 level. Subsequently, a T10 epidural catheter was placed. Testing confirmed proper placement of the catheter in the epidural space at the T10 level. A test dose of 5 mL 0.25% bupivacaine resulted in prompt and complete relief of the patient’s pain. However, the level of hypoesthesia to ice did not exceed the T10 level. Approximately 1 hour later the patient complained of increasing discomfort again. There was no evidence of any sensory block, and there was no response to a bolus of 8 mL 1% lidocaine. A thorough examination of the patient did not suggest any cause for the pain other than a malfunctioning epidural catheter. A third epidural catheter was placed at the T8-9 level. This catheter was again confirmed to be in the epidural space with a test dose of 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. The level of hypoesthesia to ice was restricted to a narrow bilateral band from T7-T9. Analgesia failed 2 hours later. The epidural catheter was removed and the patient’s pain was subsequently managed with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan revealed extensive epidural fat dorsal to the spinal cord from C5-C7 and from T3-T9. An imaging diagnosis of asymptomatic epidural lipomatosis was established.

Conclusion We have described a case of repeated failure of epidural analgesia in a patient with epidural lipomatosis.

  • Analgesia
  • Epidural
  • Laparotomy
  • Lipomatosis
  • Tachyphylaxis
  • Tsui test

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Supported by Department of Anesthesia funds, Calgary.