Original ContributionBilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: A randomized controlled trial
Introduction
Spinal fusion surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain because of extensive dissection of the skin, subcutaneous tissues, bones, and ligaments. In a large cohort study of 115,775 patients undergoing 179 types of surgical procedures, postoperative pain was most severe among those undergoing spinal fusion surgery [1]. Severe postoperative pain reduces patients' satisfaction with surgery and can delay postoperative recovery, ambulation, and discharge from the hospital [2]. Therefore, it is critical to provide adequate control of postoperative pain in spinal fusion surgery patients.
Regional anesthesia is a component of multimodal pain management in many surgeries [3]. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a novel regional anesthesia in which local anesthetic agents are injected into the plane between the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle and the vertebral transverse process. This block may act on the dorsal rami of spinal nerves [4], and it is safe and easy to perform under ultrasound guidance to reveal bony landmarks, making it an attractive regional anesthesia modality for spinal fusion surgery. It was first applied in spinal fusion surgery as part of a multimodal anesthetic regimen, and it was found to eliminate the need for opioids [5]. In another case report, ESP block significantly improved the pain trajectory and reduced opioid consumption in two patients undergoing extensive multilevel spinal fusion [6].
In order to verify the analgesic efficacy and safety of ESP block in spinal fusion surgery, we conducted what appears to be the first randomized controlled trial. Our goal was to test the hypothesis that ESP block would significantly reduce pain scores at rest within 12 h after lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Section snippets
Study design
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People's Hospital (2019PHB123-01), and it adhered to the SPIRIT statement [7]. All study subjects provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900026260) on September 28, 2019 and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The present report was composed according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
Baseline patient characteristics
The study flowchart is shown in Fig. 2. Sixty-six patients were assessed for eligibility. Two patients aged >75 years were excluded, three patients were excluded due to ASA III physical status and one patient was excluded because of a refusal to participate. Finally, 60 patients were randomized equally into the ESPB or control group. All participants successfully completed the study. The two groups were comparable in demographic and baseline clinical variables (Table 1).
NRS scores
The linear mixed-effect
Discussion
This randomized controlled study indicated that bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block provided superior pain relief with significantly lower pain scores at rest in the first 12 h after lumbar spinal fusion surgery, with lower PCA sufentanil consumption and a smaller proportion of patients requiring PCA sufentanil during the first 12 h after surgery. It also significantly reduced pain scores on movement at 4 h after surgery.
How ESP block provides analgesia is unclear. One study has suggested
Conclusion
Bilateral lumbar ESP block can decrease pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption and may be an effective component of multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Future work should confirm and extend our findings in patients using different types of multimodal analgesia, and based on a more comprehensive set of outcomes, including patient-centered ones such as quality of recovery, pain interference, and rehabilitation metrics.
Funding
The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Disclosures
The authors have no sources of funding to declare for this manuscript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
None declared.
References (35)
- et al.
Management of Postoperative Pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American pain society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ committee on regional Anesthesia, executive committee, and administrative council
J Pain
(2016) - et al.
Postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided erector Spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal decompression surgery: a randomized controlled study
World Neurosurg
(2019) - et al.
Bilateral erector Spinae plane block for acute post-surgical pain in adult cardiac surgical patients: a randomized controlled trial
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
(2019) - et al.
Anatomical description of anaesthetic spread after deep erector spinae block at L-4
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim
(2019) - et al.
Continuous erector spinae plane block at the lower lumbar level in a lower extremity complex regional pain syndrome patient
J Clin Anesth
(2018) - et al.
Local anesthetic spread during erector spinae plane block
J Clin Anesth
(2018) - et al.
Lumbar vertebra surgery performed with a bilateral retrolaminar block
J Clin Anesth
(2017) - et al.
Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block provides effective perioperative pain relief for patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery; a prospective, randomized and double blinded trial
J Clin Anesth
(2019) - et al.
Thoracolumbar interfascial block (TLIP): a new technique of interfascial plane blocks
J Clin Anesth
(2020) - et al.
Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures
Anesthesiology.
(2013)
Chronic postsurgical pain in Europe: an observational study
Eur J Anaesthesiol
The erector Spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain
Reg Anesth Pain Med
Opioid-free analgesia for posterior spinal fusion surgery using erector Spinae plane (ESP) blocks in a multimodal Anesthetic regimen
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia with bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a case report of two patients
Eur Spine J
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials
Ann Intern Med
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
BMJ.
Comparing two posterior quadratus lumborum block approaches with low thoracic erector spinae plane block: an anatomic study
Reg Anesth Pain Med
Cited by (47)
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain
2024, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews