Skip to main content
Log in

Imaging findings predicting the outcome of cervical facet joint blocks

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine which cross-sectional imaging findings predict the short-term outcome of cervical facet joint blocks (FJB) and to evaluate the effect of combined intra-/periarticular versus periarticular injection on pain. Fifty facet joints in 37 patients were included in the study. Single, unilateral FJBs in 24 patients, and bilateral single level FJBs in 13 patients were performed, respectively. In all patients, pain relief was assessed using a visual analogue scale. All computed tomography (CT) examinations were blindly reviewed by two radiologists. Osteoarthritis was rated using the Kellgren classification. The presence of combined intra-/periarticular vs. sole periarticular injection of contrast was evaluated. Kellgren Grades 0 (n=23), 1 (n=5), 2 (n=3), 3 (n=9), and 4 (n=10) were found. Mean pain relief after injection was 35% (range: 0–100%). 40% of all injections were combined intra-/periarticular. There was neither a statistically significant difference between pain relief and combined intra-/periarticular versus sole periarticular injection (p=0.64) nor the grade of osteoarthritis (p=0.49). Pain relief after cervical FJBs does not correlate with morphologic alterations seen on CT. Periarticular FJBs are not less successful than combined intra-/periarticular FJBs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roy DF, Fleury J, Fontaine SB, Dussault RG (1988) Clinical evaluation of cervical facet joint infiltration. Can Assoc Radiol J 39:118–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mikeladze G, Espinal R, Finnegan R, Routon J, Martin D (2003) Pulsed radiofrequency application in treatment of chronic zygapophyseal joint pain. Spine J 3:360–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, McDonald GJ, Bogduk N (1996) Percutaneous radio-frequency neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophyseal-joint pain. N Engl J Med 335:1721–1726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lynch MC, Taylor JF (1986) Facet joint injection for low back pain. A clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:138–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lilius G, Laasonen EM, Myllynen P, Harilainen A, Gronlund G (1989) Lumbar facet joint syndrome. A randomised clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:681–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwarzer AC, Wang SC, O’Driscoll D, Harrington T, Bogduk N, Laurent R (1995) The ability of computed tomography to identify a painful zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 20:907–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewinnek GE, Warfield CA (1986) Facet joint degeneration as a cause of low back pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216–222

  8. Helbig T, Lee CK (1988) The lumbar facet syndrome. Spine 13:61–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrera GF (1980) Lumbar facet joint injection in low back pain and sciatica: preliminary results. Radiology 137:665–667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N (1993) Comparative local anaesthetic blocks in the diagnosis of cervical zygapophysial joint pain. Pain 55:99–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Boos N, Hodler J (1999) MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints. Skeletal Radiol 28(4):215–219, Apr

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirsch C, Ingelmark BE, Miller M (1963) The anatomical basis for low back pain. Studies on the presence of sensory nerve endings in ligamentous, capsular and intervertebral disc structures in the human lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Scand 33:1–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aprill C, Bogduk N (1992) The prevalence of cervical zygapophyseal joint pain. A first approximation. Spine 17:744–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cavanaugh JM, Ozaktay AC, Yamashita HT, King AI (1996) Lumbar facet pain: biomechanics, neuroanatomy and neurophysiology. J Biomech 29:1117–1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McCall IW, Park WM, O’Brien JP (1979) Induced pain referral from posterior lumbar elements in normal subjects. Spine 4:441–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moran R, O’Connell D, Walsh MG (1988) The diagnostic value of facet joint injections. Spine 13:1407–1410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius R. Schmid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hechelhammer, L., Pfirrmann, C.W.A., Zanetti, M. et al. Imaging findings predicting the outcome of cervical facet joint blocks. Eur Radiol 17, 959–964 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0379-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0379-y

Keywords

Navigation