Table 3

Secondary outcomes: risk of bloody punctures in relation to a pause of antithrombotic drugs

Controls without antithrombotic drugsAntithrombotic drugs paused*P valueAntithrombotic drugs not pausedP value
Peripheral blocks
 Group size/no of bloody taps (%)25,299/318 (1.3)7502/232 (3.1)<0.0011330/35 (2.6)<0.001
 Crude OR (95% CI)12.51 (2.11 to 2.98)†<0.0012.12 (1.49 to 3.02)†<0.001
 Adjusted‡ OR (95% CI)11.65 (1.35 to 2.01)†<0.0011.63 (1.13 to 2.35)†<0.01
 Crude OR (95% CI)10.85 (0.59 to 1.21)§0.366
 Adjusted‡ OR (95% CI)11.0 (0.67 to 1.48)§0.997
Neuraxial blocks
 Group size/no of bloody taps (%)19,506/591 (3.0)9872/269 (2.7)0.1431244/53 (4.3)0.015
 Crude OR (95% CI)10.90 (0.78 to 1.04)†0.1431.42 (1.07 to 1.90)†0.016
 Adjusted‡ OR (95% CI)10.86 (0.73 to 1.01)†0.0591.19 (0.88 to 1.60)†0.252
 Crude OR (95% CI)11.59 (1.18 to 2.15)§<0.01
 Adjusted‡ OR (95% CI)11.42 (1.03 to 1.97)§0.033
  • *Paused was defined as a guideline-driven pause in neuraxial blocks and a pause judged adequate by the treating anesthetist in peripheral blocks.

  • †Compares patients on antithrombotic medications (paused, respectively, not paused) with controls.

  • ‡Adjusted for year of surgery, sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, use of sedative drugs or general anesthesia during block performance, catheter use versus single shot approach, multiple skin punctures, and use of ultrasound.

  • §Direct comparison of patients in whom antithrombotic medications were paused as defined and of patients without adequate pause.