RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 OP047 Going deep or staying superficial – which serratus anterior plane block wins for analgesia: a meta-analysis
JF Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
JO Reg Anesth Pain Med
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP A28
OP A29
DO 10.1136/rapm-2023-ESRA.47
VO 48
IS Suppl 1
A1 Amaral, Sara
A1 Medeiros, Heitor
A1 Lombardi, Rafael
YR 2023
UL http://rapm.bmj.com/content/48/Suppl_1/A28.2.abstract
AB Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) Application for ESRA Abstract Prizes: I don’t wish to apply for the ESRA PrizesBackground and Aims Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a popular technique for postoperative analgesia. However, the optimal approach (superficial vs. deep) remains unclear. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to compare the analgesic efficacy between the two SAPB approaches to provide clinical guidance. (PROSPERO – CRD42023415415)Methods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched for RCTs comparing superficial and deep SAPB approaches. The outcomes included opioid consumption, pain scores, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence. RevMan 5.4 analyzed data and sensitivity analysis was conducted by systematically removing each study.Results The study analyzed five RCTs with 280 patients, 50% underwent superficial SAPB approach for mastectomy or thoracoscopic lobectomy. No significant differences were found in intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in 24 hours (figure 1); pain score at rest and movement at 1h (MD -0.02; 95% CI -0.30 to 0.27; p=0.91 and MD 0.14; 95% CI -0.80 to 1.08; p=0.77); 4h (MD -0.15; 95% CI -0.86 to 0.55; p=0.67 and MD -0.19; 95% CI -0.95 to 0.56; p=0.62); 12h (MD -0.05; 95% CI -0.63 to 0.52; p=0.85 and figure 3). Sensitivity analysis did not change the overall conclusion in any of the outcomes evaluated.Abstract OP047 Figure 1 No differences were found between superficial and deep SAPB regarding opioid consumption in 24h (Results expressed in intravenous morphine equivalents)Abstract OP047 Figure 2 Pain scores were similar for both approaches to the SAPB at 12h (A) and 24h (B) in movementAbstract OP047 Figure 3 Incidence of PONV was similar both with superficial and deep SAPB approachesConclusions The results revealed no significant differences, suggesting that both approaches offer comparable pain relief benefits.