PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - John Tran
AU  - Philip Peng
AU  - Anne Agur
TI  - Evaluation of nerve capture using classical landmarks for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation: 3D cadaveric study
AID  - 10.1136/rapm-2020-101894
DP  - 2020 Nov 01
TA  - Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
PG  - 898--906
VI  - 45
IP  - 11
4099  - http://rapm.bmj.com/content/45/11/898.short
4100  - http://rapm.bmj.com/content/45/11/898.full
SO  - Reg Anesth Pain Med2020 Nov 01; 45
AB  - Background and objectives Radiofrequency (RF) denervation of the superolateral genicular nerve (SLGN), superomedial genicular nerve (SMGN) and inferomedial genicular nerve (IMGN) is commonly used to manage chronic knee joint pain. However, knowledge of articular branches captured, using classical landmarking techniques, remains unclear. In order to enhance and propose new RF procedures that conceivably capture a greater number of articular branches, more detailed cadaveric investigation is required. The objectives were to (1) determine which articular branches are captured or spared using classical landmarking techniques, and (2) evaluate the anatomical feasibility of classical landmarking techniques using three-dimensional (3D) modeling technology.Methods Ultrasound-guided classical superolateral/superomedial/inferomedial landmarking techniques were used to position RF cannulae in five specimens. The articular branches, bony and soft tissue landmarks, and cannula tip position, were meticulously dissected, digitized and modeled in 3D. Simulated lesions were positioned at the cannula tip, on the 3D models, to determine which articular branches were captured or spared. Capture rates of articular branches were compared.Results In all specimens, classical superolateral/superomedial techniques captured the transverse deep branches of SLGN and SMGN, and articular branches of lateral and medial nerve to vastus intermedius, while sparing distal branches of SLGN/SMGN. The inferomedial technique captured anterior branches of IMGN while sparing the posterior and inferior branches.Conclusions This study provides anatomical evidence supporting the effectiveness of classical landmarking for genicular nerve ablation; however, each technique resulted in sparing of articular branches. The extensive innervation of the knee joint suggests the use of supplementary landmarks to improve capture rates and potentially patient outcomes.