PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Joseph F. Cassady, Jr.,
AU  - George Lederhaas
AU  - Dawn D. Cancel
AU  - R. Jay Cummings
AU  - Eric A. Loveless
TI  - A Randomized Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescents
AID  - 10.1053/xr.2000.5661
DP  - 2000 May 01
TA  - Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
PG  - 246--253
VI  - 25
IP  - 3
4099  - http://rapm.bmj.com/content/25/3/246.short
4100  - http://rapm.bmj.com/content/25/3/246.full
SO  - Reg Anesth Pain Med2000 May 01; 25
AB  - Background and Objectives Pain and gastrointestinal dysfunction are primary factors that delay recovery after posterior spinal fusion. Previous reports suggest that the choice of analgesic management may effect the course of recovery. This prospective, randomized study compared continuous thoracic epidural analgesia and patientcontrolled analgesia in the postoperative care of adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.Methods Patients between 11 and 18 years of age were randomized to receive continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bupivacaine-fentanyl (CEA, n = 17) or intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine sulfate (n = 16). After surgery under general anesthesia, pain intensity was evaluated using a self-report visual analog scale (VAS). Postoperative time to resumption of bowel sounds, liquid intake, and side effects were also recorded.Results There were no significant differences between groups in VAS pain scores, side effects, or time to resumption of liquid intake. There was a significant difference (P = .0089) between groups in return of bowel sounds, which occurred earlier in patients receiving CEA.Conclusions Continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia are comparably effective and safe after posterior spinal fusion. Return of bowel sounds occurred significantly more rapidly in patients receiving CEA postoperatively.