Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Structural changes in the nociceptive system induced by long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation in experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy
  1. Thomas de Geus1,2,
  2. Glenn Franken1,2,
  3. Xander Zuidema1,3,
  4. Jan van Zundert1,4 and
  5. Elbert A J Joosten1,2
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  2. 2Maastricht University School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht Zeist Doorn, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to Dr Thomas de Geus; t.geus{at}hotmail.nl

Abstract

Background Clinical studies suggest that long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation (LT-SCS) for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is initially effective but may decline in efficacy over time. Preclinical studies indicate that LT-SCS alleviates mechanical hypersensitivity and enhances hind paw blood flow in PDPN rats, suggesting nociceptive system plasticity. This study hypothesized that LT-SCS induces peripheral hind paw small-fiber sprouting and reduces central protein expression of glial and P2X4 brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) pathway markers.

Methods Diabetes was induced via Streptozotocin injection in 32 rats, with 16 developing PDPN and receiving a quadrupolar lead implant. LT-SCS was applied for 4 weeks, 12 hours per day. Pain behavior was assessed using the Von Frey test for mechanical hypersensitivity and the mechanical conflict avoidance system for motivational aspects of pain. Fiber sprouting was assessed via immunohistochemical analysis of nerve fibers in the hind paw skin. Protein expression in the spinal cord was assessed using western blotting.

Results LT-SCS increased the baseline threshold of mechanical hypersensitivity in PDPN animals, consistent with previous findings, but showed no effects on motivational aspects of pain. Hind paw tissue analysis revealed significantly increased intraepidermal nerve fiber density of PGP9.5 fibers in LT-SCS animals compared with Sham-SCS animals. Protein analysis showed significantly decreased pro-BDNF expression in LT-SCS animals compared with Sham-SCS animals.

Conclusion LT-SCS induces structural changes in both peripheral and central components of the nociceptive system in PDPN animals. These changes may contribute to observed behavioral modifications, elucidating mechanisms underlying LT-SCS efficacy in PDPN management.

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • CHRONIC PAIN
  • Peripheral Nerves
  • Pain Management

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, T.J. de Geus, upon request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, T.J. de Geus, upon request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors TdG performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. TdG, GF and EAJJ conceived and designed the experiment. All authors discussed the data and critically evaluated versions of the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript. EAJJ is the guarantor for this work, taking responsibility for the overall integrity of the research and manuscript. In the preparation of this paper, AI tools, specifically ChatGPT, were utilized to assist with spelling and grammar checks as well as to enhance the overall flow of the text. These tools provided valuable support in ensuring the clarity and coherence of the written content.

  • Funding This investigator-initiated study was supported by Medtronic, which provided a research grant (contract number ERP-2020-12545) to Prof. Dr. E.A. Joosten. Medtronic was not involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data or in writing the manuscript.

  • Competing interests This investigator initiated study was supported by Medtronic, which provided a research grant (contract number ERP-2020-12545) to Prof. Dr. E.A. Joosten. Medtronic was not involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data or in writing the manuscript.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.