Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Identification of spread after deliberate intraneural injection in five mammalian species
  1. Anna Server1,
  2. Andre P Boezaart2,3,
  3. Marcos Perez-Carrasco4,
  4. Marielle Esteves-Coelho5,
  5. Franciso Laredo6 and
  6. Miguel A Reina2,7
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
  2. 2Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  3. 3Lumina Health, Surrey, UK
  4. 4Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
  5. 5Experimental Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  6. 6Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Murcia, Barcelona, Spain
  7. 7Department of Anesthesiology, CEU San Pablo University Faculty of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Miguel A Reina, Department of Anesthesiology, CEU San Pablo University Faculty of Medicine, Madrid 28047, Spain; miguelangel{at}perticone.e.telefonica.net

Abstract

Introduction This research endeavors to investigate the phenomenon of intraneural spread across distinct locations: subcircumneurium, extrafascicular intraneural, intrafascicular intraneural, and intraperineurium after deliberate intraneural injections across five mammalian species. The study also aims to propose determinants influencing this spread. Furthermore, the investigation strives to ascertain the optimal animal species and needle configuration for extrapolating intraneural injection outcomes to human contexts.

Methods This study examined 60 sciatic nerves from 30 fresh and untreated cadavers of rats, rabbits, dogs, pigs, and sheep. The specimens were organized into five groups, each comprising an equal number of nerves. Histological assessments were performed on 30 nerves, involving fascicle metrics. The remaining 30 nerves underwent intentional intraneural injections, facilitated by 19G and 23G needles under ultrasound and direct visualization guidance.

Heparinized erythrocytes combined with a methylene blue solution were used as a marker to analyze the extent and patterns of intraneural spread. Needle orifice measurements were obtained, and these data were overlaid onto images of both nerves and needles. This enabled a comparative evaluation of sizes and an assessment of marker diffusion.

Results The findings indicated that sciatic nerves in rats, rabbits, and dogs were oligofascicular, characterized by larger fascicles, whereas pigs and sheep exhibited polyfascicular nerves comprised of numerous smaller fascicles. Fascicular diameters were variable across species, with dogs presenting the largest measurements. While intraneural spread was observed and documented, intrafascicular marker spreading was rare, occurring only in one rabbit specimen. Needle orifice attributes were scrutinized and visually depicted.

Conclusions Despite the formidable challenges associated with the practical realization of intrafascicular injection, the utilization of animal models possessing monofascicular or oligofascicular nerves, such as rats, rabbits, and dogs, in conjunction with needles featuring aperture dimensions surpassing those of the fascicles, likely contributes to the compromised reliability of investigations into intraneural injection outcomes.

  • peripheral nerve injuries
  • anesthesia, conduction
  • nerve block

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @marcosperez_vh

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The title has been amended.

  • Contributors AS: project development, data collection and management, data analysis, and manuscript writing. AP-B: data collection and data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. MP-C: data collection and data analysis. ME-C: data collection and data analysis. FL: data collection and data analysis. MAR: project development, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript writing and guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.