Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
We are honored to receive a nice compliment from Dr Pascarella and colleagues, a prestigious research group.1 I would like to comment on two issues raised by them.
The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block was first published in this journal in late 2018. The latest PROSPECT guideline on hip fracture analgesia published in 2024 listed PENG block as ‘not recommended’.2 We respect the conclusion but are not discouraged by this. In their search methodology, they included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between April 4, 2005 and May 12, 2021. By May 2021, there was only a handful of controlled trials on the PENG block. However, the randomized trials on the PENG block increase exponentially as evident in our article which include RCTs up to February 2024.3 We are delighted to see the mounting evidence to support the efficacy of the PENG block with 7 randomized trials on hip fracture and 13 on hip arthroplasty.
We also echo the concern of Dr Pascraella’s group on the importance of evaluation of the spread. In performing a fascial plane block where the plane is between a bone and muscle (eg, PENG block, erector spinae plane block), the provider should pay attention to make sure that the needle ‘pierces’ through the epimysium of the muscle.4 Because the muscle epimysium cannot be indented for the needle to go through, one of the mistakes that the provider may commit is to accept the spread of injectate deep to the epimysium, simulating a muscle lift (figure 1).5 Therefore, a recent article was published to highlight some of the tips and pearls to perform the PENG block properly.4
In conclusion, the evidence supporting the analgesia efficacy of the PENG block is mounting. We are confident that the PENG will receive appropriate recognition in the next international guidelines. Practitioners performing the PENG block are encouraged to make sure the occurrence of a proper psoas lift, which is an important part of the technique.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Footnotes
X @lgiron86, @DrPhilipPeng
Contributors All authors contributed to the content of the letter.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests Both LG-A and PP are the original authors establishing the PENG block.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.