Article Text
Abstract
Background and objectives Pain catastrophizing is associated with acute pain after total knee arthroplasty. However, the association between pain catastrophizing and acute pain after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains unclear.
Methods We investigated the incidence of predicted high-pain and low-pain responders, based on a preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Scale score >20 or ≤20, respectively, and the acute postoperative pain course in both groups. Patients undergoing UKA were consecutively included in this prospective observational cohort study. Pain at rest and during walking (5 m walk test) was evaluated preoperatively, at 24 hours postoperatively, and on days 2–7 using a pain diary.
Results 125 patients were included, with 101 completing the pain diary. The incidence of predicted high-pain responders was 31% (95% CI 23% to 40%). The incidence of moderate to severe pain during walking at 24 hours postoperatively was 69% (95% CI 52% to 83%) in predicted high-pain responders and 66% (95% CI 55% to 76%) in predicted low-pain responders; OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.5 to 3.1). The incidence of moderate to severe pain at rest 24 hours postoperatively was 49% (95% CI 32% to 65%) in predicted high-pain responders and 28% (95% CI 19% to 39%) in predicted low-pain responders; OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 6.1; p=0.03). Pain catastrophizing was not associated with increased cumulated pain during walking on days 2–7.
Conclusions The incidence of predicted high-pain responders in UKA was slightly lower than reported in total knee arthroplasty. Additionally, preoperative pain catastrophizing was not associated with acute postoperative pain during walking.
- Pain, Postoperative
- Acute Pain
- Pain Management
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request.
Footnotes
Contributors AHS, HK and NBF designed the study. AHS performed data collection. AHS performed the statistical analysis. AHS and NBF wrote the first draft. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. NBF is the guarantor of this study.
Funding The salary for Anders Holten Springborg was paid through an unconditional grant from Candys Foundation to Henrik Kehlet.
Competing interests KG and AT have received institutional study funding and honorarium related to educational activities from Zimmer Biomet with no relation to the present study.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.