Reply: ‘Danger, Danger, Gaston Labat! Does zero-shot artificial intelligence correlate with anticoagulation guideline recommendations for neuraxial anesthesia?’

Nathan C Hurley; Rajnish K Gupta; Kristopher M Schroeder; Aaron S Hess

doi:10.1136/rapm-2024-105441

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

Letter

Reply: ‘Danger, Danger, Gaston Labat! Does zero-shot artificial intelligence correlate with anticoagulation guideline recommendations for neuraxial anesthesia?’

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Hurley NC, Gupta RK, Schroeder KM, et al

Reply: ‘Danger, Danger, Gaston Labat! Does zero-shot artificial intelligence correlate with anticoagulation guideline recommendations for neuraxial anesthesia?’

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine Published Online First: 14 March 2024. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105441

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password