Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Background and objectives The subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (scTAPB) provides analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall but analgesic spread following a single injection remains modest and variable. The oblique scTAPB, which is performed with a continuous injection during needle progression into the TAP along the oblique subcostal line, may extend the block to the whole anterior abdominal wall but needle progression by hydrodissection may be difficult, explaining why this block is not widely used. This study investigated if two sequential scTAPB injections (2scTAPI) may reach more nerves than a single scTAPB (1scTAPI).
Methods After institutional approval and under ultrasound guidance, a single injection of 20 mL of blue dye was performed in 16 cadaveric subjects into the TAP along the costal margin and lateral to the semilunaris line (1scTAPI). On the opposite side, a 20 mL of green solution was split into two injections (2scTAPI), using one injection medial and one lateral to the semilunaris line. Dye spread was assessed via gross anatomical dissection using an indirect method to quantify the involvement of the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves with each technique. A nerve was considered stained if the dye was observed in the TAP, reaching the costal margin aligned with the bony extremity of its corresponding rib.
Results According to the spread to the costal margin, the estimated median number of consecutive nerves reached by dye after 2scTAPI was 5 (IQR 5–6) vs 3 (IQR 3–4) for 1scTAPI (p=0.00001). Spread after 2scTAPI suggested coverage of nerves originating from T8 to T12 in 85% of the subjects, and from T7 to T12 in 5 out of 17 cases. Spread following the 1scTAPI suggested coverage of nerves from T9 to T11 in most cases.
Conclusions In a cadaveric model, a larger spread at the costal margin was obtained after 2scTAPI, suggesting a greater coverage of anterior branches of abdominal wall nerves compared with 1scTAPI. Clinical studies are needed to confirm these results.
- REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
- Ultrasonography
- Anesthesia, Local
- analgesia
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @Schaug
Contributors AS: contributed to design the study, performed the study, recorded, analyzed and interpreted data, and drafted the article. LR: conceiving and contributed to designing the study, interpretation of data, and contributed to draft revision. DB: contributed to designing the study, interpretation of data, and gave important contribution to revision of the article. All the authors (AS, SG, TB, DB and LR) gave substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work—drafted the work and revising it critically for important intellectual content—gave the final approval of the version to be published—gave agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.