Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Single-bolus injection of local anesthetic, with or without continuous infusion, for interscalene brachial plexus block in the setting of multimodal analgesia: a randomized controlled unblinded trial
  1. Patrick Rhyner1,
  2. Matthieu Cachemaille1,
  3. Patrick Goetti2,
  4. Jean-Benoit Rossel3,
  5. Melanie Boand1,
  6. Alain Farron2 and
  7. Eric Albrecht1
  1. 1Department of Anesthesia, CHUV, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
  2. 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
  3. 3Primary Care and Public Health Center (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Eric Albrecht, Department of Anesthesia, CHUV, Lausanne 1011, Vaud, Switzerland; eric.albrecht{at}chuv.ch

Abstract

Introduction Previous trials favored a continuous interscalene brachial plexus block over a single injection for major shoulder surgery. However, these trials did not administer a multimodal analgesic regimen. This randomized, controlled unblinded trial tested the hypothesis that a continuous infusion of local anesthetic for an interscalene brachial plexus block still provides superior analgesia after major shoulder surgery when compared with a single injection in the setting of multimodal analgesia, inclusive of intravenous dexamethasone, magnesium, acetaminophen and ketorolac.

Methods Sixty patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive a bolus of ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 mL, with or without a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 4–8 mL/hour, for an interscalene brachial plexus block. Patients were provided with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and on movement, and functional outcomes, measured over 48 hours after surgery.

Results Median (IQR) cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperatively was 10 mg (4–24) in the continuous infusion group and 14 mg (8–26) in the single injection group (p=0.74). No significant between-group differences were found for any of the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions A continuous infusion of local anesthetic for an interscalene brachial plexus block does not provide superior analgesia after major shoulder surgery when compared with a single injection in the setting of multimodal analgesia, inclusive of intravenous dexamethasone, magnesium, acetaminophen and ketorolac. The findings of this study are limited by performance and detection biases.

Trial registration number NCT04394130.

  • Nerve Block
  • Brachial Plexus
  • Pain Management

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @DrEAlbrecht

  • Contributors PR: study registration, data collection, manuscript editing; MC: block procedure, manuscript editing; PG: surgical procedure, manuscript editing; J-BR: statistical analysis; MB: patient recruitment, data collection; AF: surgical procedure, manuscript editing; EA: study design, block procedure, data interpretation, manuscript writing. EA is also responsible for the overall content as guarantor.

  • Funding This work was supported by a grant of €10,000 from the European Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy and by departmental funding (Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital of Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland).

  • Competing interests EA or his institution has received educational, honoraria or research funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Academy for Research in Anesthesia, BB Medical AG Switzerland, Sintetica UK and MSD AG Switzerland. No competing interests declared by the other authors.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.