Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Cadaveric study investigating the femoral nerve-sparing volume for pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block
  1. Prangmalee Leurcharusmee1,2,
  2. Perada Kantakam3,
  3. Pittayarat Intasuwan3,
  4. Yanumart Malatong3,
  5. Naraporn Maikong3,
  6. Pagorn Navic3,
  7. Nitchanant Kitcharanant4,
  8. Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh2,3,5 and
  9. De Q Tran6
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  2. 2Excellence in Osteology Research and Training Center (ORTC), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  3. 3Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  4. 4Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  5. 5Forensic Osteology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  6. 6St.Mary's Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Prangmalee Leurcharusmee, Department of Anesthesiology, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital,Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; prangmalee.l{at}cmu.ac.th

Abstract

Background This cadaveric study investigated the maximum effective volume of dye in 90% of cases (MEV90) required to stain the iliac bone between the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and the iliopubic eminence (IPE) while sparing the femoral nerve during the performance of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block.

Methods In cadaveric hemipelvis specimens, the ultrasound transducer was placed in a transverse orientation, medial and caudal to the anterior superior iliac spine in order to identify the AIIS, the IPE and the psoas tendon. Using an in-plane technique and a lateral-to-medial direction, the block needle was advanced until its tip contacted the iliac bone. The dye (0.1% methylene blue) was injected between the periosteum and psoas tendon. Successful femoral-sparing PENG block was defined as the non-staining of the femoral nerve on dissection. Volume assignment was carried out using a biased coin design, whereby the volume of dye administered to each cadaveric specimen depended on the response of the previous one. In case of failure (ie, stained femoral nerve), the next one received a lower volume (defined as the previous volume with a decrement of 2 mL). If the previous cadaveric specimen had a successful block (ie, non-stained femoral nerve), the next one was randomized to a higher volume (defined as the previous volume with an increment of 2 mL), with a probability of b=1/9, or the same volume, with a probability of 1–b=8/9.

Results A total of 32 cadavers (54 cadaveric hemipelvis specimens) were included in the study. Using isotonic regression and bootstrap CI, the MEV90 for femoral-sparing PENG block was estimated to be 13.2 mL (95% CI: 12.0 to 20.0). The probability of a successful response was estimated to be 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81 to 1.00).

Conclusion For PENG block, the MEV90 of methylene blue required to spare the femoral nerve in a cadaveric model is 13.2 mL. Further studies are required to correlate this finding with the MEV90 of local anesthetic in live subjects.

  • lower extremity
  • nerve block
  • pain management

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors PL, PK, PI, YM, NM, PN, NK and PM participated in the planning, conception, design, conduct, reporting, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation of data. DQT participated in the planning, conception, design, data analysis and interpretation of data. PL is a guarantor responsible for the overall content.

  • Funding This study was funded by the Faculty of Medicine Research Fund (Grant No. 097-2565) of Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.