Reply: ‘clarifications sought on retro-SCTL space’ | Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

other Versions

View the most recent version of this article
You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article (October 18, 2023).
earlier version (October 18, 2023).

Letter

Reply: ‘clarifications sought on retro-SCTL space’

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Sivakumar RK, Karmakar MK

Reply: ‘clarifications sought on retro-SCTL space’

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine Published Online First: 28 March 2023. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104512