Article Text

Download PDFPDF

In response: neuraxial and peripheral misconnection events leading to wrong-route medication errors
  1. Eugene Viscusi1,
  2. Vincent Hugo2,
  3. Klaus Hoerauf3,4 and
  4. Frederick S Southwick5
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2Global Medical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA
  3. 3Medical Affairs, Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA
  4. 4Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
  5. 5Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Eugene Viscusi, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; eugene.viscusi{at}jefferson.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

To the Editor

We thank Dr Patel for calling attention to his very thoughtful and insightful reviews of neuraxial and potassium chloride administration errors.1–3 We are pleased that his work complements and amplifies the results of our study.4 Our literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase, which served as the primary sources for published references on misconnection events. To supplement this, we conducted an internet search strictly for related public access documents from regulatory bodies such as the Food and Drug Administration.

The reviews authored by Dr Patel and colleagues include multiple types of human errors, while our narrative review focused on one specific error: the misconnection of intravenous tubes and syringes. To that end, we specifically omitted wrong-route cases attributed to causes other than misconnection (eg, mislabeled medication containers) and included only reports of confirmed misconnection events that noted the name of the drug administered and the patient’s health outcomes. It is of interest that in the case series of neuraxial potassium chloride administrations, approximately 50% of errors were the consequence of misconnections.1 Administration errors that were not due strictly to misconnection events, even errors occurring during the perioperative period, were beyond the scope of our current review.

We agree with Dr Patel’s assertion that there is a need for better scales to categorize incident harm in this context. Our goal in using the National Reporting and Learning System criteria5 was not to specify which reports were representative of each level of severity, but rather to collectively describe which drugs have the most severe outcomes when administered incorrectly. With regard to classifying harm, we focused on mortality because this is an unambiguous outcome and represents a ‘never event’.

When assessing the efficacy of different safety preventions, forcing functions are at the top of the pyramid. The use of non-Luer neuraxial devices to prevent the misconnection of tubing and syringes falls into this most effective safety prevention category and cannot be defeated by human error. Although non-Luer devices will not prevent all administration errors, if universally adopted, these devices could have a substantial impact. Why do clinicians and health systems tolerate these events when there is a ‘foolproof’ solution that could reduce mortality due to intravenous medication administration errors by 50%?

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors participated in the planning, preparation, and critical review of this letter and granted final approval for submission.

  • Funding This study was funded by Becton, Dickinson and Company. Assistance with manuscript preparation was provided to the authors by Sean Anderson, PhD, Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA, and was sponsored by Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA. No honoraria or other forms of payment were made for authorship.

  • Competing interests FS declares no conflicts of interest. VH and KH are employees of Becton, Dickinson and Company and own stock or stock options in the company. EV receives consulting fees from AcelRx, Concentric, Heron Therapeutics, Innacoll, Merck, Neumentum, Pfizer, Recro, Salix, and Trevena.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles