Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Pocket pain, does location matter: a single-centre retrospective study of patients implanted with a spinal cord stimulator
  1. Ganesan Baranidharan1,2,
  2. Beatrice Bretherton2,3,
  3. Gemma Richert4,
  4. Thomas Kay2,
  5. Nathan Marsh2,
  6. Bethan Roberts2 and
  7. Charlotte Romanis2
  1. 1School of Medicine, University of Leeds Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds, UK
  2. 2Pain Management, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
  3. 3School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds Faculty of Biological Sciences, Leeds, UK
  4. 4Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ganesan Baranidharan, Pain Management, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; g.baranidharan{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Objectives Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective therapy for alleviating pain but reported complication rates vary between healthcare centers. This study explored the prevalence of pain associated with Implantable Pulse Generators (IPGs), the component that powers the SCS system.

Methods This was a retrospective, single site study analyzing data from 764 patients who had a fully implanted SCS between September 2013 and March 2020. Demographic data were collected together with IPG site and type, patient reported presence of IPG site pain, revisions, explants and baseline scores for neuropathic pain (using the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs questionnaire). Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, independent sample t-tests, X2 tests of independence and logistic regression modeling.

Results IPG site pain occurred in 127 (17%) of 764 patients. These patients had higher baseline neuropathic pain scores than those who reported no IPG site pain. This complication was more common in females than males. The lowest rates of IPG site pain occurred after posterior chest wall placement and the highest rates occurred after abdominal implants. 7% of patients had revision surgery for IPG site pain (n=55) and 10 of 95 explanted patients stated that IPG site pain was a secondary influencing factor.

Conclusions These findings suggest that IPG site pain is a common complication, contributing to SCS revisions and explantation. This study shows that anatomical factors and baseline characteristics of individual patients may contribute to IPG site pain and indicates that exploration of potential factors leading to IPG revision is required.

  • spinal cord stimulation
  • postoperative complications
  • pain
  • postoperative
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors GB conceived the study and led the team. With guidance from GB, BB, TK, NM, CR and BR collected the data and BB performed the statistical analyses. BB and GR wrote the manuscript with support from GB.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests GB has consulting agreement with Nevro, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Nalu Medical and Abbott. GB had educational and research grants from Nevro, Abbott and Boston Scientific. GB has stock options with Nalu Medical. The rest of the authors report no conflicts of interest.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplementary information. All relevant data are presented in the article.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.