Response to ‘Hypospadias repair and caudal analgesia: biases and myths hinder meaningful meta-analysis’ by Haydar and Freed | Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

other Versions

You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article (December 25, 2019).
View the most recent version of this article

PostScript

Letter

Response to ‘Hypospadias repair and caudal analgesia: biases and myths hinder meaningful meta-analysis’ by Haydar and Freed

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Zhu C, Zhang S

Response to ‘Hypospadias repair and caudal analgesia: biases and myths hinder meaningful meta-analysis’ by Haydar and Freed

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine Published Online First: 25 December 2019. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101020