Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Settled science or unwarranted variation in local anesthetic dosing? An analysis from an International Registry of Regional Anesthesiology
  1. Andreas H Taenzer1,
  2. Brian D Sites1,
  3. Roman Kluger2 and
  4. Michael Barrington2
  1. 1Anesthesiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Andreas H Taenzer, Anesthesiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; andreas.h.taenzer{at}dartmouth.edu

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed in the planning, design, data analysis and interpretation as well as writing of this manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (IRB No STUDY00030887, 17 February 2018) and St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Human Research and Ethics Committee (Low-Risk Research 107/17).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed in the planning, design, data analysis and interpretation as well as writing of this manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (IRB No STUDY00030887, 17 February 2018) and St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Human Research and Ethics Committee (Low-Risk Research 107/17).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.