Chloroprocaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial | Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals More

Citation Tools

other Versions

You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article (August 21, 2019).
View the most recent version of this article

Original article

Chloroprocaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Wesselink E, Hurk GJD, Vegt RVD, et al

Chloroprocaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine Published Online First: 21 August 2019. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100673