Reply to Gofeld, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: an ethical and academic perspective | Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

other Versions

View the most recent version of this article
You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article (August 28, 2020).

PostScript

Letter to the Editor

Reply to Gofeld, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: an ethical and academic perspective

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Peng P

Reply to Gofeld, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: an ethical and academic perspective

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine Published Online First: 17 May 2019. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100639