Article Text
Abstract
Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission
Background and Aims Femoral, sciatic, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous blocks have been used individually, but combined, they can provide more effective pain relief (1-3). Combination often requires multiple needle sticks, position changes, and increased time. We developed a novel 4-in-1 block, we are calling LEENA, to target all of these nerves from a single insertion site and aim to compare this to the more conventional adductor canal block.
Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lower extremity surgeries which compared patients that received the LEENA block versus a traditional adductor canal (AC) block. Matching was performed for age, weight, gender, ASA, medications used, and surgical procedure. Our primary outcomes were block time, perioperative opioids, pain scores, and strength testing 2 weeks after surgery. Data was analyzed using Stata and P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum, the Chi-square, or Fisher’s exact test.
Results 62 patients received the LEENA block and were matched with 177 controls for a total of 239 patients. Baseline demographics were not different. The LEENA group received less opioids, had lower pain score, and required less ventilation support. Strength testing was also significantly better in the LEENA group compared to the controls 2 weeks after surgery.
Conclusions The LEENA block patients had better analgesia, avoided airway manipulation in 15% of cases, and potentially improved functional outcomes two weeks after surgery. The novel block is feasible and may have significant advantages compared to the adductor canal block alone. Prospective studies are needed to study this novel approach further.