Article Text

Download PDFPDF
EP003 Successful cutaneous sensory blockade following single and double injection techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane block: a randomized controlled trial
  1. Artid Samerchua,
  2. Panuwat Lapisatepun,
  3. Chalita Sroiwong,
  4. Prangmalee Leurcharusmee,
  5. Tanyong Pipanmekaporn,
  6. Wariya Sukhupragarn,
  7. Settapong Boonsri and
  8. Nutchanart Bunchungmongkol
  1. Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang mai, Thailand

Abstract

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission

Background and Aims This study aimed to compare the efficacy of single and double injections of ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks (S-PIPB). We hypothesized that double injections would yield superior success rates in achieving sensory blockade compared to the single injection technique.

Methods Seventy cardiac patients undergoing median sternotomy were randomly assigned to receive single or double injections of S-PIPB bilaterally. Each patient received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 μg/mL and dexamethasone 10 mg. Twenty mL/side was injected at the 3rd intercostal level in single-injection group, while 10 mL/injection was administered at the 2nd and 4th intercostal spaces in double-injection group. The primary outcome was successful S-PIPB, defined as sensory loss in the T2-T6 dermatomes at 30 minutes post-block. Secondary outcomes included block-related complications, intraoperative hemodynamics during sternotomy, fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain, and recovery quality.

Results Double injections of S-PIPB achieved greater success rates on both sides of the chest walls (81% vs 51%, P<0.001) and increased the percentage of blockade in dermatomes T1 (83% vs 59%, P<0.003), T7 (67% vs 46%, P<0.017), and T8 (61% vs 39%, P=0.001) compared to single injection. One hematoma occurred in the double-injection group. Intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain, and recovery outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions When compared to a single injection, double injections of S-PIPB provided extended coverage of the T2-T6 dermatomes, which are crucial for median sternotomy. However, no differences were observed in intraoperative hemodynamic effects or postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery.

  • cardiac surgery
  • enhanced recovery
  • pain
  • parasternal blocks
  • regional anesthesia.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.