Article Text

Download PDFPDF
OP005 Ultrasound evaluation reduces the incidence of difficult spinal anesthesia: a prospective observational study
  1. Giuseppe Pascarella1,
  2. Alessandro Strumia1,
  3. Romualdo Del Buono2,
  4. Ruggiero Alessandro3,
  5. Massimiliano Ricci3,
  6. Felice E Agrò1,
  7. Massimiliano Carassiti1 and
  8. Rita Cataldo4
  1. 1Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-medico, Rome, Italy
  2. 2Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy
  3. 3Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Università Campus Bio-medico, Rome, Italy
  4. 4Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-medico, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission

Background and Aims Although Spinal Anesthesia (SA) it is considered a safe procedure, it may give complications including headache and spinal hematoma, whose incidence increases during multiple attempts. This prospective observational study aimed to analyze the impact of pre-procedural Ultrasound (US) in reducing the incidence of difficult SA, defined as the need for a second skin puncture.

Methods Data collection included incidence of failed and difficult SA and if US evaluation (Fig. 1) was performed before SA . Moreover, we calculated the neuraxial block assessment (NBA) score to predict a high probability of difficult SA, defined as the presence of almost two risk factors (N score) including: absence of spinous processes visibility/palpability, column deformities, history of difficult SA.

Results 824 patients were included. Among them, 382 underwent preprocedural US evaluation and 442 did not. US assisted SA was associated with a significant lower risk of failure (1.6% vs. 8.1%) and difficult procedure (13% vs. 87%); p < 0.001 (Fig.2). A subgroup analysis was performed on 400 patients with difficult SA predictors. In this case, the difference in failed SA between US assisted and blind procedures was even greater (1.6% vs. 16.2%, respectively); p < 0.001. A similar trend was observed for the incidence of difficult SA (15% vs. 41.8); p < 0.001. (Fig. 3)

Abstract OP005 Figure 1

Normal ultrasound visualization of lumbar intervertebral space (transverse view) AC: Anterior Complex of dura mater; PC Posterior Complex of dura mater; TP: Transverse Process; AP: Articular Process

Abstract OP005 Figure 2

Ultrasound evaluation in general population

Abstract OP005 Figure 3

Ultrasound evaluation in patients with predicted difficult SA

Conclusions Ultrasound evaluation can significantly reduce the incidence of failed and difficult spinal anesthesia, especially in those patients with predicted difficult SA. This may lead to save time, increase patient comfort and reduce the risk of complications.

  • ultrasound
  • spinal anesthesia
  • regional anesthesia
  • neuraxial block.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.