Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission

Background and Aims The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is used in various surgical procedures as an effective and safe regional analgesia technique. Unlike other plane blocks, the ESP block provides cutaneous and visceral analgesia by involving both ventral and dorsal roots. This study compared the ESP block and the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after laparoscopic hysterectomy, aiming primarily to compare quality of recovery and secondarily to compare pain scores.

Methods A prospective randomized controlled study involved 64 patients. After ethical approval and patient consent patients undergoing elective laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly assigned to two groups: Group E received a bilateral ESPblock, and Group T received a bilateral lateralTAP block. In the recovery room, patients with an NRS of 4 or above received intravenous meperidine as rescue analgesia. The same postoperative analgesia plan was applied to all patients, including intravenous paracetamol and intramuscular diclofenac sodium. Tramadol was administered if the NRS score was 4 or above. Preoperative and postoperative quality of recovery scores, pain scores, local anesthetic effect duration, rescue analgesia use, nausea and vomiting, antiemetic use, unexpected side effects, mobilization time, and discharge time were recorded.

Results When comparing preoperative and postoperative quality of recovery scores, it was found that the decreases in scores were less in Group E. NRS scores were lower at the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 16th hours in Group E. Mobilization times were also shorter in Group E.

Conclusions The ESP block is more effective than the TAP block in improving quality of recovery and pain scores after laparoscopic hysterectomy.