Article Text

Download PDFPDF
P104 Comparative study of prilocaine 5% and ropivacaine 7,5% for spinal anesthesia in transurethral bladder tumor removal: a retrospective analysis
  1. Georgia Grenda1,
  2. Freideriki Sifaki2,
  3. Panagiotis Christidis3,
  4. Giolanta Zevgaridou1 and
  5. Eleni Koraki2
  1. 1Anesthesiology Resident, Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
  2. 2Consultant Anaesthesiologist, Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
  3. 3Orthopaedic Surgeon Resident, Fimley Work Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page)

Background and Aims Prilocaine, an amide-type local anesthetic, is known for its fast onset and intermediate duration of action. This retrospective analysis compares the duration of spinal anesthesia with prilocaine and ropivacaine in patients undergoing transurethral removal of bladder tumors (TURBT).

Methods Thirty patients scheduled for TURBT were divided into two groups: one receiving ropivacaine 7,5% (n=15) and the other prilocaine 5% (n=15). The primary hypothesis was that patients receiving prilocaine would have shorter duration of sensory and motor blockade and thus would bypass post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included recovery, hemodynamic and immediate postoperative complications.

Results Both groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics (Age, BMI, Gender), ASA classification and duration of surgery (GroupPrilocaine=36.7±13.8, GroupRopivacaine=43.8±24.4, p=0.337). The duration of sensory and motor blockade was found to be statistically significant less in patients receiving prilocaine, compared to the patients receiving ropivacaine (GroupPrilocaine= 38.3±17.8, GroupRopivacaine=61.3±33.1, p=0.025). Additionally, patients in the prilocaine group had shorter PACU duration and less mean arterial pressure drop after the performance of spinal anesthesia, when compared to the ropivacaine group patients (GroupPrilocaine= 14.7±4.11, GroupRopivacaine=22.9±6.70, p<0.001). No complications were reported.

Conclusions Prilocaine, compared to ropivacaine, contributes to a shorter duration of motor and sensory blockade, leading to a faster recovery in patients undergoing transurethral bladder tumor removal, while offering hemodynamic stability. This study suggests that prilocaine administered in spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing TURBT, may offer advantages over ropivacaine, potentially improving perioperative management and patient outcomes.

  • prilocaine
  • TURBT
  • local anesthetics
  • regional anesthesia
  • spinal anesthesia

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.