Article Text

Download PDFPDF
EP181 Quality of post-operative analgesia of paravertebral blocks vs thoracic epidurals in patients undergoing vats lobectomies
  1. Alexa Caldwell1,
  2. Christopher Durkin2,
  3. Travis Schisler2 and
  4. Anna McGuire3
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  2. 2Department of Anesthesiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
  3. 3Division of Thoracic Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada

Abstract

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant

Background and Aims Inadequate pain management after VATS lobectomies has been associated with significant morbidity. Thoracic epidurals (TEAs) have classically been the primary modality for post-operative analgesia. However, they are not without significant complications. We investigated if paravertebral blocks (PVBs) provide non-inferior postoperative analgesia while diminishing patients‘ risk of analgesia-related complications.

Methods We performed an anonymized prospective chart review of 165 patients undergoing VATS lobectomies with a PVB or a TEA at Vancouver General Hospital with local health authority approval. Postoperative pain scores at rest and with activity, and total opioid consumption, were recorded in the PACU, and on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2. The frequency of hemodynamic and respiratory complications, Foley catheterization, nausea, pruritus, and drowsiness were recorded at the same time intervals. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results 65 patients received a PVB and 100 patients received a TEA, and the groups did not differ significantly for any studied demographic variable. We did not identify any points in patients’ post-operative courses where pain, at rest and with activity, and total opioid consumption differed significantly between the two patient cohorts. Patients who received TEAs had more complications than those with PVBs, with the greatest differences found in the incidence of hemodynamic complications, pruritis, and Foley catheterization.

Abstract EP181 Figure 1

Boxplots comparing average pain scores in the PACU, and on POD0, POD1, and POD2 in patients who received either a PVB or a TEA

Abstract EP181 Figure 2

Bar plots comparing rates of side effects between patients with a PVB and a TEA for each of the seven studied complications (Hemodynamics, Respiratory, Foley Catheter, Pain, Pruritis, NV, and Drowsy)

Conclusions PVBs offer non-inferior analgesia while providing a reduced incidence of analgesia-related complications relative to TEAs in patients undergoing VATS lobectomies. PVBs should thus be considered as an effective analgesic alternative to TEAs in these patients.

  • Paravertebral Block
  • Thoracic Epidural
  • Post-Operative Pain.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.