Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Incidence of persistent opioid use following traumatic injury: an infographic
Free
  1. Matthew C Mauck1,
  2. Eric S Schwenk2 and
  3. Rajnish K Gupta3
  1. 1 Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  2. 2 Anesthesiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  3. 3 Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rajnish K Gupta, Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA; raj.gupta{at}vumc.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Summary

Insurance claims data from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2020 were used to evaluate the relationship between specific traumatic injuries and new persistent opioid use as compared with non-traumatic major or minor surgery.1 Three categories of traumatic injury were evaluated: burn, motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), and orthopedic trauma. New persistent opioid use was defined as receiving ≥1 opioid prescription 90–180 days following the injury in a patient with no opioid prescriptions in the prior year. Results showed that there was an increased incidence of new persistent opioid use of 12% in burn injury patients, 16% in patients hospitalized after a MVC, and 20% in patients hospitalized after orthopedic injury. When comparing to other surgical types, the rate of persistent opioid use was 19% in the all trauma cohort versus 13% in non-traumatic major surgery and 9% in non-traumatic minor surgery. Understanding rates of persistent opioid use among common traumas is helpful to effect positive change and improved pain management strategies for trauma survivors.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Jim Snively, artist, of Pittsburgh, PA, for graphic design of this infographic.

Reference

Footnotes

  • Twitter @ESchwenkMD, @dr_rajgupta

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests RKG and ESS are co-associate editors for Social Media in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. ESS is an editor for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. RKG is a director-at-large for the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Board of Directors.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Original research
    Matthew C Mauck Ying Zhao Amy M Goetzinger Andrew S Tungate Alex B Spencer Asim Lal Chloe E Barton Francesca Beaudoin Samuel A McLean