Article Text

Download PDFPDF

OP015 Ultrasound-guided cervical selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminer epidural injection for cervical radicular pain: a randomized, blinded, controlled study
  1. Selin Guven Kose1,
  2. Cihan Kose1,
  3. Serkan Tulgar2 and
  4. Taylan Akkaya3
  1. 1Algology, Health Science University, Kocaeli City Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
  2. 2Anesthesiology, Samsun University, Samsun, Turkey
  3. 3Algology, Health Science University, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey


Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission

Application for ESRA Abstract Prizes: I apply as a Trainee/Resident/Fellow (no age limit)

Background and Aims Cervical radicular pain is a major problem throughout the world. Generally, when conventional treatments such as oral medications and physical therapy have failed, epidural injections are recommended. The controversy regarding the most optimal technique for cervical radicular pain persists due to safety concerns. Recently, there has been a shift from fluoroscopy (FL) to ultrasound (US) to guide interventional procedures.

Methods The trial was registered on Patients with unilateral cervical radiuclar pain were randomly divided into two groups (figure 1): FL-guided interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection (IL-CESI) and the US-guided cervical selective nerve root block (CSNRB) group (figure 2). Severity of pain and disability were assessed with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and Neck Disability Index at baseline, and 1,3 and 6 months after treatment. Fifty percent or more improvement in NRS-11 was defined as treatment success and an improvement in NRS of at least 2 points was defined as minimally clinically important difference (MCID). Changes in analgesic use was also recorded.

Results Significant improvement in pain and disability scores was observed during 6 months compared to baseline in both groups(P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the proportion of subjects experiencing MCID, achieving a positive treatment outcome, quality of life and analgesic use. The procedure time was longer in the IL-CESI group.

Abstract OP015 Figure 1

Flowchart of the study

Abstract OP015 Figure 2

Ultrasound images of the C5 (A), C6 (B) and C7 (C) nerve roots

Conclusions The effectiveness of US-guided CSNRB is comparable to FL-guided IL-CESI for cervical radicular pain. However, US-guided CSNRB offers the advantage of shorter procedure duration and eliminates the need for radiation exposure.

  • ultrasound
  • ervical selective nerve root block
  • epidural injection
  • radicular pain
  • chronic pain

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.