Article Text

Download PDFPDF

EP013 Effect of local anesthetic volume (20 vs 40 ml) on analgesic efficacy of costoclavicular block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled trial
  1. Yumin Jo1,
  2. Chahyun Oh1,
  3. Woo-Yong Lee2,
  4. Yoon-Hee Kim1,
  5. Youngkwon Ko1,
  6. Woosuk Chung1,
  7. Boohwi Hong1 and
  8. Eunhye Park1
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
  2. 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea


Background and Aims Various diaphragm-sparing alternatives to interscalene block have been studied. Costoclavicular block(CCB) as the alternative, demonstrated low hemidiaphragm paralysis(HDP) occurrence but inconsistent analgesic effect in our previous study. We hypothesized that a larger volume for CCB could provide sufficient analgesia by achieving supraclavicular spreading. Therefore, we compared analgesic efficacy and HDP occurrence of two different volumes of local anesthetic(LA) for CCB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Methods Sixty patients who scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly allocated into either of groups; CCB20(0.75% ropivacaine 20mL) or CCB40(0.375% ropivacaine 40mL). After induction and CCB, supraclavicular spreading at supraclavicular fossa and HDP were evaluated with ultrasound observation. The primary outcome was the rate of participants who reported zero pain score at rest 1 hour postoperatively. Postoperative analgesia outcomes and outcomes HDP related were evaluated.

Results The rate of complete analgesia with NRS 0 at PACU were 23.3%(7/30) in CCB20 and 33.3%(10/30) in CCB40(p=0.567). The pain score at 1 hour postoperatively was no significantly different between the groups(3 [1 to 5] in CCB20 vs 2 [0 to 4] in CCB40; p=0.395). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups(p<0.098) in complete HDP occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the ultrasound observation of supraclavicular spreading was significantly associated with no and mild pain(pain score <4) at immediate postoperative period regardless allocated group.

Abstract EP013 Table 1

Primary outcome, HDP incidence and evaluation of supraclavicular spreading

Abstract EP013 Table 2

Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with immediate postoperative pain grade

Conclusions The larger volume of LA doesn’t guarantee supraclavicular spreading of CCB. Observing supraclavicular spreading using the ultrasound after CCB can be used as a tool to predict acute pain after shoulder surgery.

  • Peripheral nerve block
  • costoclavicular block
  • local anesthetic volume
  • arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.