EP005 Pecs 2 block for open biceps tenodesis: no analgesic benefit vs. surgical field infiltration | Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

ePoster session 1 – Station 1

EP005 Pecs 2 block for open biceps tenodesis: no analgesic benefit vs. surgical field infiltration

Free

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Hertling A, Cuff G, Youm T, et al

EP005 Pecs 2 block for open biceps tenodesis: no analgesic benefit vs. surgical field infiltration

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2023;48:A41-A42.