Article Text

Download PDFPDF

#35752 Ultrasound vs fluoroscopy in the management of cervical radicular pain: can we replace fluoroscopy?
  1. Monica Andreea Sandu
  1. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ilfov County Hospital, Bucharest, Romania


Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page)

Application for ESRA Abstract Prizes: I don’t wish to apply for the ESRA Prizes

Background and Aims Transforaminal Epidural steroid injection is an extremely valuable tool in the conservative management of cervical radicular pain. For decades this injection has been performed under fluoroscopic guidance and while complications are serious and infrequent, this imaging technique cannot prevent inadvertent arterial puncture. Considering delicate cervical anatomy, ultrasound may bring a valid alternative, allowing for real time needle advancement, at no radiation expenses. Recent medical studies have supported the use of Ultrasound as a pivotal imaging tool and as an alternative to the gold standard of this procedure. The aim of this presentation is to illustrate the Cervical TESI, comparing the ultrasound to the already consolidated imaging tool.

Methods This review describes advantages and disadvantages of US guided cervical epidural steroid injection techniques compared to the fluoroscopic guidance, as encountered in the recent medical literature.

Results Despite the lack of foraminal flow visualization, recent medical studies have demonstrated correct target identification with immediate and long- term effectiveness of extraforaminal (periradicular) US guided steroid injections. A higher volume showed an increase in the foraminal flow, without modifying the outcome. Also, recently, a new technique of US guided transforaminal epidural injection has been described and investigated.

Conclusions Ultrasound guided injections have several meaningful advantages over any other imaging technique, providing real time visualization and possibly preventing inadvertent vascular canulation. However, the US guided technique cannot demonstrate utility regarding the posterior foraminal vasculature, thus still relying on aspiration and fluoroscopic confirmation. Until further research, a combination of both US and Fluoroscopic guided techniques remains the recommended approach.

  • Cervical radicular pain
  • ultrasound imaging guidance
  • cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection
  • fluoroscopy

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.