Article Text

Download PDFPDF

SP7 Cryoneurolysis of cutaneous nerves: what should we know?
  1. TF Bendtsen
  1. Aarhus University Hospital, Anaesthesiology, Aarhus, Denmark


Neuropathic pain after surgery and trauma can be severe and debilitating and lead to low quality of life. The frequency of persistent neuropathic pain after surgery and trauma is as high as 10–50% depending on the type of surgery.1,2 Very often the pain problem remains unsolved despite extensive and thorough investigation of possible medical, surgical and traumatic causes of the pain problem including exploratory surgery and other interventions.

A main generator of persistent postsurgical neuropathic pain is cutaneous neuropathy, which is due to injury of peripheral nerves innervating the skin and the pain is localized in the skin area innervated by the injured nerve. Thus, neuropathy can appear in any skin area innervated by a nerve injured by surgery or trauma. Injury of cutaneous nerves during surgery cannot be avoided as the entire skin is innervated by a dense network of ramifications of cutaneous nerves. Often the injured nerve regenerates and normal sensation is reestablished. When this does not happen, the injured nerve endings start constant or intermittent firing of pain signals. Cutaneous neuropathy typically feels intense, burning, sharp, or like electric shock.

Cryoneurolysis for the treatment of neuropathic pain after surgery and trauma is approved by in the States and Europe3: A purpose-made double-barrel needle (gauged 1–2 mm) is inserted until the needle tip touches the target nerve. The cryoneurolysis system makes the needle tip generate a few-mm-wide ice-ball that interrupts the nerve fibers. The ice-ball is generated by gas (typically carbon dioxide, CO2) driven by high pressure through the inner needle to an opening at the tip of the inner needle. The gas expansion instantly cools the gas (Joule-Thompsons effect) and the needle tip is cooled down to minus 60–80°C depending on the choice of gas. The gas is vented back to the cryoneurolysis system via the outer needle. Thus, the cryoprobe is designed as a ‘closed circuit’, and the gas stays contained inside the double-needle.4 The duration of the freezing is typically two minutes creating the few mm thick ice-ball at the tip of the needle. Repetition of the freeze/thaw cycle can increase the thickness of the ice-ball.4

The virtue of cryoneurolysis with carbon dioxide as opposed to globally neurodestructive techniques such as radio-frequency ablation (RFA) and glycerol injection and surgical transsection is that cryoneurolysis with carbon dioxide selectively interrupts the axons in the target nerve and their myelin sheaths but leaves the connective tissue skeleton of the nerve intact securing normal regeneration of the axons and their sheaths.5 This relieves the neuropathic pain for 4–12 months, while normal nerve fiber regeneration is ongoing.5,6

The neurodestructive effect of extreme cold is well-established. Sunderland expanded Seddon’s classification of nerve injury due to cold from three to five categories in 1953.7,8 Together, the five categories make a continuum of increasing severity of nerve injury from no macroscopic structural injury to irreversible destruction of the entire nerve trunk. The target of therapeutic cryoneurolysis is the category axonotmesis. This is selective destruction of axons and myelin sheaths leaving the connective neural tissue skeleton intact by freezing the target thoroughly in the temperature range from minus 20 to minus 100 degrees Celcius. Temperatures exceeding this range would lead to neurotmesis, which is irreversible total neurodestruction.6

Cryoneurolysis with carbon dioxide never reach temperature lower than minus 78 degrees Celcius as this is the boiling point of the gas. The phase transition from gas to a solid occurs when carbon dioxide is cooled below the boiling points. Consequently, a cryoneurolysis system using carbon dioxide is safe guarded against the irreversible nerve destruction of neurotmesis.6

The only adverse events associated with cryoneurolysis using carbon dioxide are rarely occurring incidents of short-duration localized pain, minor swelling, bleeding or infection at the site of intervention. No studies have reported any serious or persistent adverse effects even after repeated cryoneurolysis.9,10 Cryoneurolysis can be repeated as the maintained integrity of the endoneurium (axonotmesis) allows uncomplicated normal axonal regeneration.

Clinical cryoneurolysis studies have been carried out on a range of cutaneous nerves: the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve,11,12 the intermediary femoral cutaneous nerves,13 the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve,14 the genitofemoral,15 the pudendal nerve,16 the sural nerve,17 the occipital nerve,18–20 the intercostal nerves,21,22 the intercostobrachial nerve,23 the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastricus nerves,24,25 and the saphenous nerve.26,27 In addition, a study of cryoneurolysis has been carried out on large mixed sensori-motor nerves such as the femoral, sciatic and obturator nerves.28 Follow-up demonstrated complete regeneration of muscle strength in the innervated muscles.28

Most of the studies cited above present data of significant pain relief with cryoneurolysis of cutaneous nerves – but the results are heterogenous and flawed by high incidences of failure of pain relief.

The first cause of failure of cryoneurolysis is lack of knowledge about cutaneous nerves and cutaneous nerve territories. Consequently, many cutaneous nerves that are relevant for cutaneous neuropathy after surgery and trauma are never attempted to be targeted. The second cause of failure is lack of direct visual ultrasonographic identification of true target nerve. The third cause of failure is inaccuracy of needle tip placement exactly adjacent to the target nerve. The fourth cause of failure is the small diameter of the ice-ball capable of generating freezing below -20 degrees Celcius, as the -20 degrees Celcius isotherm is just a few millimeters from the surface of the tip of the cryoprobe when CO2 is the gas of choice.

During the last 20 years ultrasound has become a pervasive tool for visualization and localization and local anesthetic blockade of peripheral nerves in clinical anesthesiology. However, the resolution of conventional ‘high-frequency ultrasound’ (up to 20 MHz) just allows visualization of the large mixed sensori-motor nerves and major sensory nerves (eg. the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve). Thus, the caliber of the ubiquitous small skin nerves has so far been too small to be visible and possible targets using conventional high-frequency ultrasound as interventional guidance. In order to solve this problem cryoneurolysis has been applied either on the few large and sensory nerves visible with ultrasound or cryoneurolysis has been applied along ‘treatment lines’ in presumed locations of small invisible neuropathic nerves. This has compromised the success rate of cryoneurolysis.

Conclusion In summary, persistent painful cutaneous neuropathy is frequent after surgery and trauma. However, (1) the specific skin area of neuropathy is rarely localized, (2) the specific associated neuropathic nerves are not identified and visualized, (3) cryoneurolysis is an effective and safe technology for focused and specific treatment of cutaneous neuropathy, but the applicability is limited by lack of techniques and technology for ultrasound guided visualization of many small cutaneous nerves, (4) the applicability of cryoneurolysis with CO2 is limited by the narrow action radius from the surface of the tip of the cryoprobe to the -20 degrees Celcius isotherm.


  1. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet2006; 367:1618–1625.

  2. Borsook D, Kussman BD, George E, et al. Surgically-Induced Neuropathic Pain (SNPP): Understanding the perioperative process. Ann Surg 2013; 257(3):403–412.

  3. Gabriel RA, Ilfeld BM. Novel methodologies in regional anesthesia for knee arthroplasty. Anesthesiol Clin 2018; 36(3):387–401.

  4. Trescot AM. Cryoanalgesia in interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2003;6(3):345–360.

  5. Ilfeld BM. continuous peripheral nerve blocks: an update of the published evidence and comparison with novel, alternative analgesic modalities. Anesth Analg 2017; 124:308–335.

  6. Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ. Cryoneurolysis and percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation to treat acute pain. Anesthesiology 2020; 133(5):1127–1149.

  7. Seddon HJ. Three types of nerve injuries. Brain 1943; 66:237.

  8. Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain 1953; 74:491–516.

  9. Radnovich R, Scott D, Patel AT, et al. Cryoneurolysis to treat the pain and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25(8): 1247–1256.

  10. Bittman RW, Peters GL, Newsome JM, et al. Percutaneous image-guided cryoneurolysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210(2): 454–465.

  11. Finneran JJ, Swisher MW, Gabriel RA, et al. Ultrasound-guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve cryoneurolysis for analgesia in patients with burns. J Burn Care Res 2020; 41(1): 224–227.

  12. Johnson C, Sisante J-F, Alm J, et al. Cryoneurolysis for the treatment of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve pain: a case report. PM&R 2020; 12(4): 423–424.

  13. Dalili D, Ahlawat S, Rashidi A, et al. Cryoanalgesia of the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve (AFCN) for the treatment of neuropathy-mediated anterior thigh pain: anatomy and technical description. Skeletal Radiol 2020. Online ahead of print.

  14. Joshi DH, Thawait GK, Grande FD, Fritz J. MRI-guided cryoablation of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve for the treatment of neuropathy-mediated sitting pain. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46(7):983–987.

  15. Campos NA, Chiles JH, Plunkett AR. Ultrasound-guided cryoablation of genitofemoral nerve for chronic inguinal pain. Pain Physician 2009; 12(6): 997–1000.

  16. Prologo JD, Lin RC, Williams R, Corn D. Percutaneous CT-guided cryoablation for the treatment of refractory pudendal neuralgia. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44(5): 709–714.

  17. Bonham LW, Phelps A, Rosson GD, Fritz J. Mr imaging-guided cryoneurolysis of the sural nerve. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29(11): 1622–1624.

  18. Kim CH, Hu W, Gao J, et al. Cryoablation for the treatment of occipital neuralgia. Pain Physician 2015; 18(3): E363–368.

  19. Kastler A, Attye A, Maindet C, et al. Greater occipital nerve cryoneurolysis in the management of intractable occipital neuralgia. J Neuroradiol 2018; 45(6): 386–390.

  20. Stogicza A, Trescot A, Rabago D. New technique for cryoneuroablation of the proximal greater occipital nerve. Pain Pract 2019; 19(6): 594–601.

  21. Clemence J Jr, Malik A, Farhat L, et al. Cryoablation of intercostal nerves decreased narcotic usage after thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 32(3): 404–412.

  22. Rettig RL, Rudikoff AG, Lo HYA, et al. Cryoablation is associated with shorter length of stay and reduced opioid use in pectus excavatum repair. Pediatr Surg Int 2021; 37(1): 67–75.

  23. Weber G, Saad K, Awad M, Wong TH. Case report of cryoneurolysis for the treatment of refractory intercostobrachial neuralgia with postherpetic neuralgia. Local Reg Anesth 2019; 12: 103–107.

  24. Wood GJ, Lloyd JW, Bullingham RE, et al. Postoperative analgesia for day-case herniorrhaphy patients. A comparison of cryoanalgesia, paravertebral blockade and oral analgesia. Anaesthesia 1981; 36(6): 603–610.

  25. Callesen T, Bech K, Thorup J, et al. Cryoanalgesia: effect on postherniorrhaphy pain. Anesth Analg 1998; 87(4): 896–899.

  26. Dasa V, Lensing G, Parsons M, et al. Percutaneous freezing of sensory nerves prior to total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2016; 23(3): 523–528.

  27. Mihalko WM, Kerkhof AL, Ford MC, et al. Cryoneurolysis before total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe osteoarthritis for reduction of postoperative pain and opioid use in a single-center randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2020; Online ahead of print.

  28. Prologo JD, Johnson C, Hawkins CM, et al. Natural history of mixed and motor nerve cryoablation in humans - a cohort analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31(6): 912–916 e911.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.