Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Hospital safety-net burden is associated with increased inpatient mortality after elective total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective multistate review, 2007–2018
  1. Deirdre Clare Kelleher1,
  2. Ryan Lippell1,
  3. Briana Lui1,
  4. Xiaoyue Ma2,
  5. Tiffany Tedore1,
  6. Roniel Weinberg1 and
  7. Robert S White1
  1. 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
  2. 2 Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Robert S White, Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Anesthesiology, New York, New York 10065, USA; rsw33{at}cornell.edu

Abstract

Background Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is among the most common surgical procedures performed in the USA and comprises an outsized proportion of Medicare expenditures. Previous work-associated higher safety-net burden hospitals with increased morbidity and in-hospital mortality following total hip arthroplasty. Here, we examine the association of safety-net burden on postoperative outcomes after TKA.

Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1 141 587 patients aged ≥18 years undergoing isolated elective TKA using data from the State Inpatient Databases for Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, New York and Washington from 2007 through 2018. Hospitals were grouped into tertiles by safety-net burden status, defined by the proportion of inpatient cases billed to Medicaid or unpaid (low: 0%–16.83%, medium: 16.84%–30.45%, high: ≥30.45%). Using generalized estimating equation models, we assessed the association of hospital safety-net burden status on in-hospital mortality, patient complications and length of stay (LOS). We also analyzed outcomes by anesthesia type in New York State (NYS), the only state with this data.

Results Most TKA procedures were performed at medium safety-net burden hospitals (n=6 16 915, 54%), while high-burden hospitals performed the fewest (n=2 04 784, 17.9%). Overall in-patient mortality was low (0.056%), however, patients undergoing TKA at medium-burden hospitals were 40% more likely to die when compared with patients at low-burden hospitals (low: 0.043% vs medium: 0.061%, adjusted OR (aOR): 1.40, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.79, p=0.008). Patients who underwent TKA at medium or high safety-net burden hospitals were more likely to experience intraoperative complications (low: 0.2% vs medium: 0.3%, aOR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.83, p<0.001; low: 0.2% vs high: 0.4%, aOR: 1.91, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.72, p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in other postoperative complications or LOS between the different safety-net levels. In NYS, TKA performed at high safety-net burden hospitals was more likely to use general rather than regional anesthesia (low: 26.7% vs high: 59.5%, aOR: 4.04, 95% CI 1.05 to 15.5, p=0.042).

Conclusions Patients undergoing TKA at higher safety-net burden hospitals are associated with higher odds of in-patient mortality than those at low safety-net burden hospitals. The source of this mortality differential is unknown but could be related to the increased risk of intraoperative complications at higher burden centers.

  • regional anesthesia
  • outcomes
  • postoperative complications

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Deidentified patient data was obtained from the State Inpatient Databases (SID), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. SID data are available for purchase through the HCUP Central Distributor. All HCUP data users, including data purchasers and collaborators, must complete the online HCUP Data Use Agreement Training Tool, and must read and sign the Data Use Agreement for State Databases. The contact email for HCUP is hcup@ahrq.gov.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Deidentified patient data was obtained from the State Inpatient Databases (SID), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. SID data are available for purchase through the HCUP Central Distributor. All HCUP data users, including data purchasers and collaborators, must complete the online HCUP Data Use Agreement Training Tool, and must read and sign the Data Use Agreement for State Databases. The contact email for HCUP is hcup@ahrq.gov.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @MiniMDKelleher, @RobertWhiteMD

  • Contributors DCK: planning, conception and design, interpretation of data, reporting. RL: planning, conception and design, interpretation of data, reporting. BL: planning, conception and design, interpretation of data, reporting. XM: planning, conception and design, interpretation of data. TT: planning, conception and design, interpretation of data. RW: planning, conception and design, interpretation of data. RSW: planning, conception and design, interpretation of data, reporting.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.