Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Comparison of continuous intravenous lidocaine versus transversus abdominis plane block for kidney transplant surgery: a randomized, non-inferiority trial
  1. Neil A Hanson1,2,
  2. Joseph Strunk2,
  3. Genna Saunders2,
  4. Nick G Cowan3,
  5. Jared Brandenberger4,
  6. Christian S Kuhr3,
  7. Christine Oryhan2,
  8. Daniel T Warren2,
  9. April E Slee5 and
  10. Wyndam Strodtbeck2
  1. 1 Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2 Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
  3. 3 Urology, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
  4. 4 Urology and General Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
  5. 5 Statistics, Axio Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Neil A Hanson, Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; sagara{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background and objectives Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are associated with an improvement in postoperative analgesia following kidney transplant surgery. However, these blocks carry inherent risk and require a degree of expertise to perform successfully. Continuous intravenous lidocaine may be an effective alternative. In this randomized, non-inferiority study, we hypothesized that a continuous lidocaine infusion provides similar postoperative analgesia to a TAP block.

Methods Subjects presenting for kidney transplant surgery were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an ultrasound-guided unilateral, single-injection TAP block (TAP group) or a continuous infusion of lidocaine (Lido group). The primary outcome of this non-inferiority study was opioid consumption within the first 24 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, patient satisfaction, opioid-related adverse events, time to regular diet, and persistent opioid use.

Results One hundred and twenty subjects, 59 from the TAP group and 61 from the Lido group, completed the study per protocol. Analysis of the primary outcome showed a cumulative geometric mean intravenous morphine equivalent difference between the TAP (14.6±3.2 mg) and Lido (15.9±2.4 mg) groups of 1.27 mg (95% CI −4.25 to 6.79; p<0.001), demonstrating non-inferiority of the continuous lidocaine infusion. No secondary outcomes showed clinically meaningful differences between groups.

Conclusions This study demonstrates that a continuous infusion of lidocaine offers non-inferior postoperative analgesia compared with an ultrasound-guided unilateral, single-injection TAP block in the first 24 hours following kidney transplant surgery.

Trial registration number NCT03843879.

  • analgesia
  • drug-related side effects and adverse reactions
  • nerve block
  • pain
  • postoperative
  • ultrasonography

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @JosephStrunkMD

  • Contributors NAH helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. JS helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. GS helped conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. NGC helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. JB helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. CSK helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. CO helped conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. DW helped conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. AS helped analyze the data and write the manuscript. WS helped conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript.

  • Funding Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles