You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 45, Issue 3
  • Response to ‘Hypospadias repair and caudal analgesia: biases and myths hinder meaningful meta-analysis’ by Haydar and Freed

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Response to ‘Hypospadias repair and caudal analgesia: biases and myths hinder meaningful meta-analysis’ by Haydar and Freed

https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-101020

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    PDF extract preview

    You do not have access to the full text of this article, the first page of the PDF of this article appears above.

    Footnotes

    • Contributors This letter has not been published or presented elsewhere in part or in entirety, and is not under consideration by another journal. All the authors have approved the letter and agree with submission to the esteemed journal.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles