Statistics from Altmetric.com
Within the regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine (RAAPM) Twitter community, the two common hashtags are #regionalanesthesia and #regionalanaesthesia.1 Hashtags (words/phrases following a “#” symbol) identify themed tweets.
Before COVID-19, a common RAAPM topic was opioids, and many fear the opioid epidemic will worsen post-pandemic.2 We tested the hypothesis that the proportion of #regionalanesthesia and #regionalanaesthesia tweets related to opioids has decreased since COVID-19.
This project was deemed exempt by the institutional review board.
English language tweets including #regionalanesthesia or #regionalanaesthesia were prospectively collected using TAGS V.188.8.131.52.3 The first tweet in either hashtag archive to reference COVID-19 was on March 18, 2020. We therefore set our convenience sample from February 1 through April 30, 2020, to compare tweets 6 weeks before (pre) and after (post) this seminal tweet. We included original tweets, replies, and retweets. We excluded duplicates and tweets lacking either hashtag.
The primary outcome was the proportion of tweets during each time interval referencing opioids. Microsoft Excel (Redmond, Washington, USA) was used to search for opioid terminology and opioid names.
Microsoft Excel was used to search broadly for terms related to COVID-19. Users were categorized manually by ERM and KMJ using Symplur Healthcare Stakeholder Definitions.4 Tweets were assigned to one of four published categories: scientific, logistical, social, or other.5 Inter-rater reliability for tweet categorization was determined using Cohen’s kappa statistic. The top 10 influencers were determined by tweets and impressions.5
Statistical analysis was performed using NCSS Statistical Software (NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, Utah, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics V.23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). The χ2 test with Yates correction was used for all comparisons of categorical data. For the primary outcome, a two-sided p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All other analyzes were considered exploratory and not adjusted for multiple comparisons.
From 1603 individual tweets with #regionalanesthesia or #regionalanaesthesia, 1268 tweets comprised the final sample after de-duplication: 780 pre (210 original, 561 retweets, and 9 replies) and 488 post (184 original, 287 retweets, and 17 replies). Retweets decreased from 71.9% pre to 58.8% post (p<0.001); original tweets increased from 26.9% pre to 37.7% in the post interval (p<0.001).
Opioid tweets decreased from 2.7% (21/780) pre to 0.4% (2/488) post (p=0.006).
COVID-19 tweets increased from 0% pre to 26.6% (130/488) post (p<0.001). Doctors had the largest tweet decrease (−242 tweets), from 59.7% (466/780) pre to 45.9% (224/488) post (p<0.001). Individual other health showed the largest tweet increase (+48 tweets), from 1.3% (10/780) pre to 11.9% (58/488) post (p<0.001). Cohen’s kappa statistic was 0.796 (“substantial” agreement between reviewers)6 for the categorization of 420 original tweets. From pre to post, the proportion of “other” tweets increased (figure 1). All 20 tweets in the “other” category were medical device advertisements.
Comparison of influencers
The top 10 influencers of #regionalanesthesia or #regionalanaesthesia in the pre and post intervals are shown in table 1.
This study reveals a focus shift within the RAAPM Twitter community since COVID-19 arrived with fewer mentions of the opioid epidemic and more industry advertisements using regional anesthesia hashtags. However, an overall decrease in activity among the top 10 influencers also occurred, which may relate to increased clinical demands on anesthesiologists during COVID-19 or an appropriate change in topical priorities to personal protective equipment and critical care skills. Given the ongoing overlap of the COVID-19 pandemic and opioid epidemic, we encourage physicians in the RAAPM Twitter community to continue to use these hashtags to help disseminate information on opioids and nerve blocks as elective surgeries and normal clinical activities resume.
This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System (Palo Alto, California, USA). The contents do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.
Twitter @ESchwenkMD, @Neuro_Kellie, @dr_rajgupta, @amit_pawa, @EMARIANOMD
Contributors ESS helped design the study, collected and analyzed data, drafted and revised the initial manuscript, reviewed and approved the submitted manuscript. KJ helped design the study, collected and analyzed data, drafted and revised the initial manuscript, reviewed and approved the submitted manuscript. RKG helped design the study, reviewed and approved the submitted manuscript. NME helped design the study, reviewed and approved the submitted manuscript. AP helped design the study, reviewed and approved the submitted manuscript. AK collected and analyzed data, reviewed and approved the submitted manuscript. ERM helped design the study, collected and analyzed data, drafted and revised the initial manuscript, reviewed and approved the submitted manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests AP has received honoraria from GE Healthcare and consults for B. Braun Medical (Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK). RKG consults for MedCreds (San Francisco, California, USA). NME consults for Foundry Therapeutics (Menlo Park, California, USA).
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.