Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound versus nerve stimulator guidance for axillary brachial plexus block
  1. Michael J. Barrington, PhD, MBBS, FANZCA,
  2. Samuel R. Gledhill, MMedStat,
  3. Roman Kluger, FANZCA, PGDipBiostat,
  4. Alexander L. Clarke, MBBS,
  5. Daniel M. Wong, FANZCA,
  6. Henry Davidson, MBBS and
  7. Rowan Thomas, FANZCA, MPH
  1. From the Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Address correspondence to: Michael J. Barrington, PhD, MBBS, FANZCA, Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria Parade, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065; Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia (e-mail: Michael.BARRINGTON{at}svha.org.au).

Abstract

Background Ultrasound-guided techniques improve outcomes in regional anesthesia when compared with traditional techniques; however, this assertion has not been studied with novices. The primary objective of this study was to compare sensory and motor block after axillary brachial plexus block when performed by novice trainees allocated to an ultrasound- or nerve–stimulator-guided group. A secondary objective was to compare the rates of skill acquisition between the 2 groups.

Methods This study was a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, 2-arm controlled trial. Anesthesia trainees participating in this trial were novices to axillary brachial plexus block and sonography. All trainee participants underwent a standardized training program. The primary outcome was combined sensory and motor block in the relevant territories 30 minutes after completion of block. A global rating scale was used to assess trainee block performance.

Results The study was ceased after 12 trainees completed 153 blocks. There was no difference between groups in combined motor-sensory score (P = 0.28) or as a function of block number (P = 0.38). There was no difference in onset between groups (P = 0.38). In both groups, there was an increase in the global rating scale score (P < 0.0001) and reduced preblock survey and block performance times (P = 0.001) with experience.

Conclusions We were unable to demonstrate a difference in the efficacy of axillary brachial plexus block performed by novices when ultrasound guidance was compared with a nerve stimulator technique. There was evidence of similarly improved clinical performance of novices in both groups.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    This project was funded by a research grant from the Australian Society of Anaesthetists.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.