Article Text
Abstract
Background and Objectives In this randomized double-blind prospective study in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy, we compared the effects of ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block using 20 mL (intervention group) and 40 mL (control group) of a mepivacaine 1.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% mixture (1:1 volume) on ipsilateral handgrip strength and other postoperative end points.
Methods One hundred fifty-four patients scheduled for ambulatory shoulder arthroscopy were randomly assigned to receive a single-injection interscalene block under ultrasound guidance with either 40 mL (control) or 20 mL (intervention) and intravenous sedation. The primary outcome was the change in ipsilateral handgrip strength in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) measured with a dynamometer. Secondary end points were recorded, including negative inspiratory force, incidences of hoarseness and Horner syndrome, time to readiness for discharge from PACU, time to discharge from PACU, patient satisfaction, time to block resolution, and pain scores.
Results Postoperative handgrip strength was greater in the 20-mL group compared with the 40-mL group (difference in means, 2.3 kg [95% confidence interval, 0.6–4.0 kg]; P = 0.009). A smaller proportion of patients in the intervention group experienced hoarseness postoperatively compared with the control group (odds ratio, 0.26 [95% confidence interval, 0.08–0.82]; P = 0.015). Patient satisfaction and duration of analgesia were similar in both groups.
Conclusions When used for surgical anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopies in the ambulatory setting, a 20-mL volume in an ultrasound-guided interscalene block preserves greater handgrip strength on the ipsilateral side in the PACU compared with 40 mL without significant decrease in block success, duration of analgesia, and patient satisfaction.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01701115 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01701115?term=low+dose+isb&rank=1).
Work should be attributed to the Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery.
This study was funded by the Hospital for Special Surgery, Anesthesiology Department, Research and Education Fund, New York, NY. The REDCap electronic data capture tools are funded by the CTSC grant (UL1 TR000457-06) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
This study was previously presented at the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Meeting in April 2015.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citation appears in the printed text and is provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.rapm.org).