You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 37, Issue 6
  • The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Liposome Bupivacaine Administered Via a Single Epidural Injection to Healthy Volunteers

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Liposome Bupivacaine Administered Via a Single Epidural Injection to Healthy Volunteers
  1. Eugene R. Viscusi, MD*,
  2. Keith A. Candiotti, MD†,
  3. Erol Onel, MD‡,
  4. Michael Morren, RPh, MBA§ and
  5. Guy L. Ludbrook, MBBS, PhD∥
  1. From the *Acute Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA;
  2. †Department of Anesthesiology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL;
  3. ‡Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc; and
  4. §Peloton Advantage, LLC, Parsippany, NJ; and
  5. ∥Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
  1. Address correspondence to: Eugene R. Viscusi, MD, Acute Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St, Suite G-8490, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (e-mail: eugene.viscusi{at}jefferson.edu).

Abstract

Background and Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics, sensory/motor effects, and safety of epidurally administered liposome bupivacaine versus bupivacaine HCl in healthy volunteers.

Methods Thirty subjects were randomized to receive liposome bupivacaine 89, 155, or 266 mg, or bupivacaine HCl 50 mg in a double-blind fashion. Occurrence/duration of motor blockade, pinprick/cold sensitivity, and plasma bupivacaine levels were assessed for 96 hours after study drug administration. Tolerability parameters were also assessed.

Results All doses of liposome bupivacaine resulted in greater area under the curve and a longer time to observed maximum plasma concentration and terminal elimination half-life than bupivacaine HCl 50 mg. Mean maximum plasma concentration with liposome bupivacaine 89 and 155 mg (but not 266 mg) was statistically significantly lower than with bupivacaine HCl 50 mg (P < 0.001). Median duration of motor blockade with liposome bupivacaine 266 mg was 1 hour versus 2.8 hours for bupivacaine HCl. Of subjects who received liposome bupivacaine 266 mg, 29% (2/7) were unable to ambulate at 4 hours postdose versus 67% (4/6) of those receiving bupivacaine HCl. Median durations of pinprick/cold sensitivity loss were 36 and 69 hours, respectively, in the liposome bupivacaine 266-mg group versus 12 hours for both pinprick and cold in the bupivacaine HCl group. Liposome bupivacaine was well tolerated; the most common adverse event in all treatment groups was injection site pain, which resolved within 30 days for most subjects.

Conclusions Epidurally administered liposome bupivacaine 266 mg resulted in a longer duration of sensory blockade than liposome bupivacaine 89 or 155 mg or bupivacaine HCl 50 mg. Duration of motor blockade was shorter with liposome bupivacaine 266 mg versus bupivacaine HCl.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e318269d29e

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Footnotes

    • This work is attributed to the Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

    • Author contributions: Dr Viscusi was involved with the analysis/interpretation of data, drafting, revising manuscript, review, and final approval. Dr Onel was involved in all study design, statistical analysis, study supervision, manuscript preparation, and final approval. Mr Morren was involved in literature searching, writing, and editorial revisions based on coauthor feedback throughout the manuscript preparation process and final approval. Dr Candiotti was involved with all study design, statistical analysis, analysis/interpretation of data, drafting, revising manuscript, review, and final approval. Prof Ludbrook was involved in the conduct of the study, data collection, manuscript review, and final approval.