Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Persistent Median Artery (Palmar Type) and Median Nerve Block in the Forearm: Observational Study of Prevalence
  1. James A. Stimpson, FRCA and
  2. Ashwani Gupta, FRCA, EDRA
  1. From the Department of Anaesthetics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk, UK.
  1. Address correspondence to: Ashwani Gupta, FRCA, EDRA, 14 Brambling Lane, Norwich NR4 7LJ, Department of Anaesthetics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Gayton Rd, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, PE30 4ET, UK (e-mail: ashwani_doc{at}yahoo.com).

Abstract

Background We sought to define the crude prevalence rate of the persistent median artery (PMA) (palmar type). Although there is no reported case in the anesthetic literature, a few sporadic case reports and series reported in anatomical and orthopedic journals describe an incidence of between 1.5% and 27.1%.

Methods We conducted a prospective observational study to define the crude prevalence of the PMA (palmar type) by scanning 100 forearms of 50 volunteers using a high-frequency ultrasound probe.

Results We found 19 PMAs in 13 individuals, thus giving a prevalence of 19%. Other arterial variants were also identified within this population.

Conclusions Anatomical variations of the blood supply to the forearm and hand can be identified with available high-frequency ultrasound equipment. Arterial variants immediately adjacent to the median nerve may occur in approximately 1 in 5 limbs. Practitioners should actively seek their presence or absence.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • The project was entirely supported by the resources of the Department of Anaesthetics of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn. None of the authors have any financial interest in this research.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.