Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Persistent Pain After Inguinal Herniotomy: A Systematic Review
  1. Mads U. Werner, MD, DMSc*,
  2. Joakim M. Bischoff, MD,
  3. James P. Rathmell, MD and
  4. Henrik Kehlet, MD, DMSc
  1. From the *Multidisciplinary Pain Center and
  2. Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Denmark; and
  3. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  1. Address correspondence to: Mads U. Werner, MD, DMSc, Multidisciplinary Pain Center, 7612, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark (e-mail: mads.u.werner{at}gmail.com).

Abstract

Abstract In the United States, it is estimated that between 6000 and 18,000 individuals each year present with disabling pain after inguinal hernia repair. Although surgical treatment with mesh removal is one of few options available, effective alternatives to nonsurgical management are needed. The use of pulsed radiofrequency (PFR), leading to nondestructive lesions of nerve structures, has been proposed as a treatment option. To examine the evidence of treatment efficacy, a systematic literature search was made. From the databases PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL, 4 case reports were retrieved and 8 patients were included for analysis. The PFR treatment was peripheral (n = 4) and central (n = 4). Pain relief varied between 63% and 100%, the follow-up period was 3 to 9 months, and no adverse effects or complications were reported. In conclusion, the evidence base of PRF in persistent pain after inguinal herniotomy is fairly limited. Suggestions for improved research strategies are presented.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • Supported by a grant from the Europain project, which is funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (grant no. 115007).