Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Distribution Patterns, Dermatomal Anesthesia, and Ropivacaine Serum Concentrations After Bilateral Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
  1. Jens Børglum, MD, PhD, MBA*,
  2. Kenneth Jensen, MD, BBA*,
  3. Anders F. Christensen, MD, PhD,
  4. Lotte C.G. Hoegberg, PhD, MSc,
  5. Sys S. Johansen, PhD, MSc§,
  6. P.-A. Lönnqvist, MD, DMSc and
  7. Tejs Jansen, MD*
  1. From the Departments of *Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine,
  2. Radiology, and
  3. Anesthesia and the Danish Poison Information Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital: Bispebjerg;
  4. §Section of Forensic Chemistry, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; and
  5. Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Astrid Lindgrens Children’s Hospital/Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  1. Address correspondence to: Jens Børglum, MD, PhD, MBA, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital: Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23 DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark (e-mail: jens.borglum{at}


Background and Objectives The ability of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks to anesthetize the upper abdomen remains debatable. We aimed to describe the local anesthetic distribution following ultrasound-guided TAP blocks with repeated magnetic resonance imaging investigations and to relate this to the resulting dermatomal anesthesia.

Methods Eight volunteers were included in a randomized, observer-blinded study. Sixty milliliters of ropivacaine 0.375% was administered: 1 injection of 30 mL as a lateral classic TAP block, followed by a sham upper intercostal TAP block, and on the contralateral side, 2 separate 15-mL injections at the upper intercostal and lateral classic TAP plexuses, respectively. The primary outcome measure was magnetic resonance imaging–assessed area expansion of all injectates over a 6-hr period. Dermatomal anesthesia and sequential serum ropivacaine levels were recorded at the same time intervals.

Results All injectate areas expanded in a statistically significant manner in the anterior abdominal wall. Lateral classic TAP blocks with 30-mL injectates did not extend into the upper intercostal TAP plexus. The dual 15-mL injectates on the other hemiabdomen remained within the upper intercostal and lateral classic TAP compartments and resulted in significantly (P < 0.018) more widespread dermatomal anesthesia. Measured serum ropivacaine concentrations were below the potential level of toxicity.

Conclusions Magnetic resonance imaging analysis revealed a significant time-dependent expansion of injectates. Magnetic resonance imaging and the degree of dermatomal anesthesia confirmed that the upper and lateral TAP compartments do not appear to communicate. Separate injections at the upper intercostal and lateral classic TAP plexuses are necessary to block the entire abdominal wall.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This study was financed by the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital: Bispebjerg, Denmark.