Article Text

PDF
Beyond Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance: Advanced Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Anesthesia Research
  1. Yan Ma, PhD*,,
  2. Madhu Mazumdar, PhD and
  3. Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD
  1. From the *Research Division, Hospital for Special Surgery;
  2. Department of Public Health; and
  3. Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY.
  1. Address correspondence to: Yan Ma, PhD, Research Division, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (e-mail: may{at}hss.edu).

Abstract

Background and Objectives Research in the field of anesthesiology relies heavily on longitudinal designs for answering questions about long-term efficacy and safety of various anesthetic and pain regimens. Yet, anesthesiology research is lagging in the use of advanced statistical methods for analyzing longitudinal data. The goal of this article was to increase awareness of the advantages of modern statistical methods and promote their use in anesthesia research.

Methods Here we introduce 2 modern and advanced statistical methods for analyzing longitudinal data: the generalized estimating equations (GEE) and mixed-effects models (MEM). These methods were compared with the conventional repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) through a clinical example with 2 types of end points (continuous and binary). In addition, we compared GEE and MEM to RM-ANOVA through a simulation study with varying sample sizes, varying number of repeated measures, and scenarios with and without missing data.

Results In the clinical study, the 3 methods are found to be similar in terms of statistical estimation, whereas the parameter interpretations are somewhat different. The simulation study shows that the methods of GEE and MEM are more efficient in that they are able to achieve higher power with smaller sample size or lower number of repeated measurements in both complete and missing data scenarios.

Conclusions Based on their advantages over RM-ANOVA, GEE and MEM should be strongly considered for the analysis of longitudinal data. In particular, GEE should be used to explore overall average effects, and MEM should be used when subject-specific effects (in addition to overall average effects) are of primary interest.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This work is attributed to Research Division, Hospital for Special Surgery; Department of Public Health, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; and Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.