We performed a systematic search of the medical literature and reviewed the evidence examining success rates and incidence of complications of ultrasound (US) guidance relative to traditional techniques for the following blocks: paravertebral, intercostal, transversus abdominis plane, rectus sheath, and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric. We included studies of sufficient methodologic quality for review and excluded poor-quality studies. We then rated the strength of evidence for US guidance for each block using a system developed by the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Although relatively few studies have compared US guidance with established techniques, the available evidence suggests that the use of US guidance is a safe and effective means to facilitate correct needle placement and adequate spread of local anesthetic for truncal blocks. Further studies are needed to directly compare US guidance to traditional techniques and to clarify potential benefits and limitations of US guidance for truncal blocks.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
This research was funded internally by the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University. No outside funding was provided by any governmental, other public or private agency, or industrial entity.