Background and Objectives: The use of ultrasonography in regional anesthetic blocks has rapidly evolved over the past few years. It has been speculated that ultrasound guidance might increase success rates and reduce complications. The aim of our study is to compare the success rate and quality of interscalene brachial plexus blocks performed either with direct ultrasound visualization or with the aid of nerve stimulation to guide needle placement.
Methods: A total of 160 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I-III) scheduled for trauma-related upper arm surgery were included in this randomized study and grouped according to the guidance method used to deliver 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% for interscalene brachial plexus blockade. In the ultrasound group (n = 80), the brachial plexus was visualized with a linear 5 to 10 MHz probe and the spread of the local anesthetic was assessed. In the nerve stimulation group (n = 80), the roots of the brachial plexus were located using a nerve stimulator (0.5 mA, 2 Hz, and 0.1 millisecond bandwidth). The postblock neurologic assessment was performed by a blinded investigator.
Results: Sensory and motor blockade parameters were recorded at different points of time. Surgical anesthesia was achieved in 99% of patients in the ultrasound vs 91% of patients in the nerve stimulation group (P < .01). Sensory, motor, and extent of blockade was significantly better in the ultrasound group when compared with the nerve stimulation group.
Conclusions: The use of ultrasound to guide needle placement and monitor the spread of local anesthetic improves the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus block.
- Regional anesthetic technique
- Interscalene brachial plexus block
- Equipment: ultrasound
- Local anesthetics: ropivacaine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Reprint requests: Peter Marhofer, M.D., Department of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail:
See Editorial page 195