Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A Method to Estimate the Depth of the Sciatic Nerve During Subgluteal Block by Using Thigh Diameter as a Guide
  1. Eric C. Crabtree, M.D.,
  2. Marc Beck, M.D.,
  3. Brian R. Lopp, M.D.,
  4. Mace Nosovitch, M.D.,
  5. John N. Edwards, M.D. and
  6. André P. Boezaart, M.B.Ch.B., F.F.A. (C.M.S.A.), M.Med. (Anaesth.), Ph.D.
  1. Regional Anesthesia Study Center of Iowa (RASCI), Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  1. Reprint requests to André P. Boezaart, M.B.Ch.B., F.F.A. (C.M.S.A.), M.Med. (Anaesth.), Ph.D., Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail: andre-boezaart{at}uiowa.edu

Abstract

Background and Objective: The subgluteal approach is common for sciatic nerve block. Although the surface landmarks are clear, the depth of this nerve at this level is difficult to judge. The purpose of this study is to establish a method of estimating the sciatic nerve depth using the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the thigh as a marker.

Methods: The study was undertaken in 2 phases. Phase 1 entailed review of 100 magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the pelvis and proximal lower extremity of patients. Measurements were taken of the AP diameter of the thigh at the midpoint of the lesser trochanter and then compared with distances of the sciatic nerves from the skin of the posterior aspect of the thigh at the same level. Phase 2 involved enrolling 40 patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery for whom subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks were indicated. The AP diameters of the thighs were measured from the subgluteal groove to the inguinal groove with the patient in the supine position. Placing the patient in the lateral position, the subgluteal sciatic block was then performed by using a stimulating needle. The distances from the skin at which the sciatic nerves were actually found, as estimated by maximum motor response to stimulus, were noted.

Results: Phase 1 showed a mean AP diameter of 18.94 cm ± 2.61 cm (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), mean nerve depth of 6.51 cm ± 1.46 cm (mean ± SD), and a linear regression slope of 0.48. Phase 2 showed a mean AP diameter of 16.28 cm ± 2.73cm (mean ± SD), a mean nerve depth of 6.99 cm ± 1.39 cm (mean ± SD), and a linear regression slope of 0.43. The thigh diameters differed (P < .001) between the groups, but there was no difference in the depth to the sciatic nerve between the 2 groups (P = .07).

Conclusions: Comparing phase 1 and phase 2 datasets shows the slopes of linear regression lines are nearly parallel. The clinical data from phase 2 verify the anatomical data collected in phase 1 and show that the sciatic nerve depth to AP diameter ratio is 0.43 or the depth of the sciatic nerve is approximately 43% of thigh diameter if the patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position.

  • Sciatic nerve depth
  • Sciatic nerve block
  • Subgluteal block
  • Regional

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Presented as a poster at the 2005 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Meeting in Toronto, Canada, April 21-4, 2005.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.